Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32716959›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Quantitative ultrasound radiomics for therapy response monitoring in patients with locally advanced breast cancer: Multi-institutional study results.

Karina Quiaoit, Daniel DiCenzo, Kashuf Fatima, Divya Bhardwaj, Lakshmanan Sannachi, Mehrdad Gangeh, Ali Sadeghi-Naini, Archya Dasgupta, Michael C Kolios, Maureen Trudeau and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. CT-Based Radiomics forCancers · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Karina QuiaoitDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Daniel DiCenzoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Kashuf FatimaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Divya BhardwajDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Lakshmanan SannachiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Mehrdad GangehDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Ali Sadeghi-NainiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5055-339X
Archya DasguptaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Michael C KoliosDepartment of Physics, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada.
Maureen TrudeauMedical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Sonal GandhiMedical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Andrea EisenMedical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Frances WrightSurgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Nicole Look-HongSurgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Arjun SahgalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Greg StaniszPhysical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Christine BrezdenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Saint Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Robert DinniwellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
William T TranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Wei YangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Belinda CurpenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Gregory J CzarnotaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0519-2182

Funding

CIHR PJT 159759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). The study was conducted to investigate the utility of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) carried out during NAC to predict the final tumour response in a multi-institutional setting.

methodsFifty-nine patients with LABC were enrolled from three institutions in North America (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Toronto, Canada), MD Anderson Cancer Centre (Texas, USA), and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto, Canada)). QUS data were collected before starting NAC and subsequently at weeks 1 and 4 during chemotherapy. Spectral tumour parametric maps were generated, and textural features determined using grey-level co-occurrence matrices. Patients were divided into two groups based on their pathological outcomes following surgery: responders and non-responders. Machine learning algorithms using Fisher's linear discriminant (FLD), K-nearest neighbour (K-NN), and support vector machine (SVM-RBF) were used to generate response classification models.

resultsThirty-six patients were classified as responders and twenty-three as non-responders. Among all the models, SVM-RBF had the highest accuracy of 81% at both weeks 1 and week 4 with area under curve (AUC) values of 0.87 each. The inclusion of week 1 and 4 features led to an improvement of the classifier models, with the accuracy and AUC from baseline features only being 76% and 0.68, respectively.

conclusionQUS data obtained during NAC reflect the ongoing treatment-related changes during chemotherapy and can lead to better classifier performances in predicting the ultimate pathologic response to treatment compared to baseline features alone.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringUltrasonographyAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingROC CurveSupport Vector MachineTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32716959
PMCPMC7384762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.