Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32716948›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Rapid assessment and prediction of the efficiency of two preservatives against S. aureus in cosmetic products using High Content Screening-Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.

Samia Almoughrabie, Chrisse Ngari, Laurent Guillier, Romain Briandet, Valérie Poulet, Florence Dubois-Brissonnet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of Volatile Organic Compounds ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samia AlmoughrabieMicalis Institute, Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Chrisse NgariLaboratoires Clarins, Pontoise, France.
Laurent GuillierDirection de l'évaluation des risques, ANSES, Agence nationale de sécurité de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Romain BriandetMicalis Institute, Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8123-3492
Valérie PouletLaboratoires Clarins, Pontoise, France.
Florence Dubois-BrissonnetMicalis Institute, Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2998-7518
AgroParisTech · FRGroupe Clarins (France) · FRAgence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most cosmetic products are susceptible to microbiological spoilage due to contaminations that could happen during fabrication or by consumer's repetitive manipulation. The composition of cosmetic products must guarantee efficient bacterial inactivation all along with the product shelf life, which is usually assessed by challenge-tests. A challenge-test consists in inoculating specific bacteria, i.e. Staphylococcus aureus, in the formula and then investigating the bacterial log reduction over time. The main limitation of this method is relative to the time-consuming protocol, where 30 days are needed to obtain results. In this study, we have proposed a rapid alternative method coupling High Content Screening-Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (HCS-CLSM), image analysis and modeling. It consists in acquiring real-time S. aureus inactivation kinetics on short-time periods (typically 4h) and in predicting the efficiency of preservatives on longer scale periods (up to 7 days). The action of two preservatives, chlorphenesin and benzyl alcohol, was evaluated against S. aureus at several concentrations in a cosmetic matrix. From these datasets, we compared two secondary models to determine the logarithm reduction time (Dc) for each preservative concentration. Afterwards, we used two primary inactivation models to predict log reductions for up to 7 days and we compared them to observed log reductions. The IQ model better fits datasets and the Q value gives information about the matrix level of interference.

Indexed as

Microscopy, ConfocalCosmeticsKineticsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilityPreservatives, PharmaceuticalStaphylococcus aureusTime FactorsCosmeticsPreservatives, Pharmaceutical

Identifiers

PMID32716948
PMCPMC7384607
OpenAlexW3045864954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.