ArticlePloS one2020
Analysis of Twitter data with the Bayesian fused graphical lasso.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We propose a method to simplify textual Twitter data into understandable networks of terms that can signify important events and their possible changes over time. The method allows for common characteristics of the networks across time periods and each period can comprise multiple unknown sub-networks. The networks are described by Gaussian graphical models and their parameter values are estimated through a Bayesian approach with a fused lasso-type prior on the precision matrices of the underlying mixtures of the sub-models. A flexible data allocation scheme is at the heart of an MCMC algorithm to recover mean and covariance parameters of the mixture components. Several implementations of the outlined estimation procedure are studied and compared based on simulated data. The procedure with the highest predictive power is used for mining tweets regarding the 2009 Iranian presidential election.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.