Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32716852›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2020

Head motion during fMRI tasks is reduced in children and adults if participants take breaks.

Tobias W Meissner, Jon Walbrin, Marisa Nordt, Kami Koldewyn, Sarah Weigelt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Alternative Brain Connectivity Underscores Age-Related Differences in the Processing of Interactive Biological Motion.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Functional and morphological correlates of developmental dyslexia: A multimodal investigation of the ventral occipitotemporal cortex.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tobias W MeissnerTU Dortmund University, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Vision, Visual Impairments & Blindness, Emil-Figge-Str. 50, 44227, Dortmund, Germany; Ruhr University Bochum, Faculty of Psychology, Universitätsstr. 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany. Electronic address: tobias.meissner@tu-dortmund.de.
Jon WalbrinBangor University, School of Psychology, Developmental Social Vision Lab, Penrallt Road, Bangor, LL57 2AS, Wales, United Kingdom; University of Coimbra, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Proaction Lab, Rua Colégio Novo, 3000-115, Coimbra, Portugal. Electronic address: jon.walbrin@uc.pt.
Marisa NordtRuhr University Bochum, Faculty of Psychology, Universitätsstr. 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany; Stanford University, Psychology Department, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. Electronic address: marisa.nordt@rub.de.
Kami KoldewynBangor University, School of Psychology, Developmental Social Vision Lab, Penrallt Road, Bangor, LL57 2AS, Wales, United Kingdom. Electronic address: k.koldewyn@bangor.ac.uk.
Sarah WeigeltTU Dortmund University, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Vision, Visual Impairments & Blindness, Emil-Figge-Str. 50, 44227, Dortmund, Germany. Electronic address: sarah.weigelt@tu-dortmund.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head motion remains a challenging confound in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of both children and adults. Most pediatric neuroimaging labs have developed experience-based, child-friendly standards concerning e.g. the maximum length of a session or the time between mock scanner training and actual scanning. However, it is unclear which factors of child-friendly neuroimaging approaches are effective in reducing head motion. Here, we investigate three main factors including (i) time lag of mock scanner training to the actual scan, (ii) prior scan time, and (iii) task engagement in a dataset of 77 children (aged 6-13) and 64 adults (aged 18-35) using a multilevel modeling approach. In children, distributing fMRI data acquisition across multiple same-day sessions reduces head motion. In adults, motion is reduced after inside-scanner breaks. Despite these positive effects of splitting up data acquisition, motion increases over the course of a study as well as over the course of a run in both children and adults. Our results suggest that splitting up fMRI data acquisition is an effective tool to reduce head motion in general. At the same time, different ways of splitting up data acquisition benefit children and adults.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildFemaleHeadHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingYoung AdultData qualityDevelopmentMock scanner trainingMovementPediatric neuroimagingStudy design

Identifiers

PMID32716852
PMCPMC7284013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.