ReviewAJOB neuroscience
The BRAIN Initiative and Neuroethics: Enabling and Enhancing Neuroscience Advances for Society.
Review in AJOB neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Ethics of brain-computer interface in mental healthcare.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Ethical gaps in closed-loop neurotechnology: a scoping review.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- An XYZ-axis Matrix Approach for the Integration of Neuroscience and Neuroethics.Experimental neurobiology · 2023Review
- A comparative review on neuroethical issues in neuroscientific and neuroethical journals.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Neurotechnology and Noninvasive Neuromodulation: Case Study for Understanding and Anticipating Emerging Science and Technology.NAM perspectives · 2023Review
- Article
- The Brain Research Hotspot Database (BRHD): A Panoramic Database of the Latest Hotspots in Brain Research.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Ethical Issues Posed by Field Research Using Highly Portable and Cloud-Enabled Neuroimaging.Neuron · 2020Review
- Ethical implications of BRAIN 2.0: Beyond bioethics, beyond borders.AJOB neuroscienceArticle
- Translational Neuroethics: A Vision for a More Integrated, Inclusive, and Impactful Field.AJOB neuroscienceArticle
- Neuroethicists' Perspectives on Ethical Issues in Neurotechnology Industry-Academia Partnerships.AJOB neuroscienceArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the Brain Research through Advancing Neurotechnologyies, better known as the BRAIN Initiative moves forward at a rapid pace increasing attention has focused on neuroethics. The National Institutes of Health recently mandated a review of the progress of the BRAIN Initiative progress with the goal of fine-tuning its future directions. The BRAIN Working Group 2 focused its discussion on science while the BRAIN Neuroethics Subgroup focused on neuroethics. The Brain Neuroethics Subgroup deliberated for over a year collecting information and recommendations through in person and video meetings, a public one-day neuroethics symposium and soliciting input from neuroscientists and neuroethicist's. The resulting report entitled "The BRAIN Initiative and Neuroethics: Enabling and Enhancing Neuroscience Advances for Society" was accepted by Director of NIH in October of 2019. The recommendations span many BRAIN research neuroethics concerns including privacy considerations, the use of nonhuman primate model systems, neural modulation and enhancement, subject participation in BRAIN research and equity in neuroscience research. Further the group recommended a transformative project whose goal of detailing the scientific mechanisms and ethical underpinnings of consciousness is one of the most daunting issues that impact our perceptions of ourselves. It is anticipated that the report?s recommendations will provide a foundation or "roadmap" for ensuring that neuroethics and BRAIN research move forward as an integrated effort thereby insuring that BRAIN research is of the highest quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32716755What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.