ArticleAJOB neuroscience
Of Ethical Frameworks and Neuroethics in Big Neuroscience Projects: A View from the HBP.
Article in AJOB neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- An XYZ-axis Matrix Approach for the Integration of Neuroscience and Neuroethics.Experimental neurobiology · 2023Review
- How Neurotech Start-Ups Envision Ethical Futures: Demarcation, Deferral, Delegation.Science and engineering ethics · 2023Article
- A comparative review on neuroethical issues in neuroscientific and neuroethical journals.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- International data governance for neuroscience.Neuron · 2022Review
- Fostering neuroethics integration: disciplines, methods, and frameworks.AJOB neuroscience · 2020Article
- A "salad bowl" approach to neuroethics collaboration.AJOB neuroscience · 2020Article
- Translational Neuroethics: A Vision for a More Integrated, Inclusive, and Impactful Field.AJOB neuroscienceArticle
- The Urgent Need to Better Integrate Neuroscience and Neuroethics.AJOB neuroscienceArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recently published BRAIN 2.0 Neuroethics Report offers a very helpful overview of the possible ethical, social, philosophical, and legal issues raised by neuroscience in the context of BRAIN's research priorities thus contributing to the attempt to develop ethically sound neuroscience. In this article, we turn to a running theme of the document: the need for an ethical framework for the BRAIN Initiative and for further integration of neuroethics and neuroscience. We assess some of the issues raised and provide an explanation of how we have addressed them in the Human Brain Project. We offer our experience in the HBP as a potential contribution to the international debate about neuroethics in the big brain initiatives. Our hope is that among other things, the type of exchange proposed by this AJOB special issue will prove productive in further identifying and discussing the issues and in inspiring appropriate solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32716744What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.