ArticleJAMA network open2020
Assessment of Physician Priorities in Delivery of Preventive Care.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05463887 (Personalized Disease Prevention), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Personalized Disease Prevention (PDP): A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Individualized Preventive Care Recommendations vs Usual Care on Patient Interest and Use of Recommendations: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- The Potential for a Benefit-Estimating Algorithm to Improve Recommendations for Preventive Services: Comparing Algorithm Recommendations with Those of Primary Care Providers.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026Article
- Article
- Primary care stakeholder perspectives on clinical implementation of patient-reported hereditary cancer risk-assessment.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Collaborative Research Priority Setting for Enhancing Primary Health Care Access Among the Nepalese Community in Canada: Community-Based Participatory Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines Among Age-Eligible US Women: Findings From NHIS 2021.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Patient-Centered Prioritization of Health Care Processes for Multimorbidity.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Impact of an MRI Body Fat Imaging Report on Obesity-Related Cardiometabolic Risk: Findings From the BODY-REAL Study, A Randomized Trial.Obesity science & practice · 2025Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Optimal Fluoride Varnish Application.Academic pediatrics · 2024Article
- Effect of GP visits in the compliance of preventive services: a cross-sectional study in Europe.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Underlying motivations hampering Flemish primary care physicians from overcoming the barriers in osteoporosis care: an EMR-facilitated clinical reasoning study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Primary care provider perspectives on the role of community pharmacy in colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Physician-Reported Barriers to Osteoporosis Screening: A Nationwide Survey.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2023Article
- Clinical encounter length and initiation of statin therapy for primary prevention among adults with elevated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2023Article
- Personalized Disease Prevention (PDP): study protocol for a cluster-randomized clinical trial.Trials · 2022Article
- Priorities for improvement across cancer and non-cancer related preventive services among rural and non-rural clinicians.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Clinicians' perceptions of barriers to cervical cancer screening for women living with behavioral health conditions: a focus group study.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Developing the Healthy Actions and Lifestyles to Avoid Dementia orAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Primary care physicians have limited time to discuss preventive care, but it is unknown how they prioritize recommended services. Objective: To understand primary care physicians' prioritization of preventive services. Design, Setting, and Participants: This online survey was administered to primary care physicians in a large health care system from March 17 to May 12, 2017. Physicians were asked whether they prioritize preventive services and which factors contribute to their choice (5-point Likert scale). Results were analyzed from July 8, 2017, to September 19, 2019. Exposures: A 2 × 2 factorial design of 2 hypothetical patients: (1) a 50-year-old white woman with hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, obesity, a 30-pack-year history of smoking, and a family history of breast cancer; and (2) a 45-year-old black man with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, a 30-pack-year history of smoking, and a family history of colorectal cancer. Two visit lengths (40 minutes vs 20 minutes) were given. Each patient was eligible for at least 11 preventive services. Main Outcomes and Measures: Physicians rated their likelihood of discussing each service during the visit and reported their top 3 priorities for patients 1 and 2. Physician choices were compared with the preventive services most likely to improve life expectancy, using a previously published mathematical model. Results: Of 241 physicians, 137 responded (57%), of whom 74 (54%) were female and 85 (62%) were younger than 50 years. Physicians agreed they prioritized preventive services (mean score, 4.27 [95% CI, 4.12-4.42] of 5.00), mostly by ability to improve quality (4.56 [95% CI, 4.44-4.68] of 5.00) or length (4.53 [95% CI, 4.40-4.66] of 5.00) of life. Physicians reported more prioritization in the 20- vs 40-minute visit, indicating that they were likely to discuss fewer services during the shorter visit (median, 5 [interquartile range {IQR}, 3-8] vs 11 [IQR, 9-13] preventive services for patient 1, and 4 [IQR, 3-6] vs 9 [IQR, 8-11] for patient 2). Physicians reported similar top 3 priorities for both patients: smoking cessation, hypertension control, and glycemic control for patient 1 and smoking cessation, hypertension control, and colorectal cancer screening for patient 2. Physicians' top 3 priorities did not usually include diet and exercise or weight loss (ranked in their top 3 recommendations for either patient by only 48 physicians [35%]), although these were among the 3 preventive services most likely to improve life expectancy based on the mathematical model. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study, physicians prioritized preventive services under time constraints, but priorities did not vary across patients. Physicians did not prioritize lifestyle interventions despite large potential benefits. Future research should consider whether physicians and patients would benefit from guidance on preventive care priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.