ReviewJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2020
Distinguishing Predatory from Reputable Publishing Practices.
Review in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Analysis of Solicitations From Predatory Journals in Ophthalmology.American journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Writing a manuscript for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal: Guidance from the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2024Article
- Ten Ways to Improve Getting a Scientific Manuscript Accepted.Head and neck pathology · 2024Article
- Reframing the perception of outliers and negative data in translational research.Brain research bulletin · 2023Review
- Navigating the Path to Publication: A Guide for the Novice Researcher.Kansas journal of medicine · 2023Article
- Academic standing and publication.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2022Article
- Wilfully submitting to and publishing in predatory journals - a covert form of research misconduct?Biochemia medica · 2021Article
- Perception of nurse academicians on academic publications: A cross-sectional study.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationArticle
- 'Publish or Perish!': perception and self-appraisal of Indian physicians on academic publications: A cross-sectional study.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The preponderance of journals with dubious publishing practices has resulted in a new term in academic publishing:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.