Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32715956›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular structure & dynamics2021

Virtual screening, ADMET prediction and dynamics simulation of potential compounds targeting the main protease of SARS-CoV-2.

Rohitash Yadav, Mohammed Imran, Puneet Dhamija, Dheeraj Kumar Chaurasia, Shailendra Handu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rohitash YadavDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Mohammed ImranDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Shaqra University, Shaqra, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Puneet DhamijaDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Dheeraj Kumar ChaurasiaSupercomputing Facility for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India.
Shailendra HanduDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease-2019 caused by a novel SARS CoV-2 virus has emerged as a global threat. Still, no drugs are available for its treatment. The main protease is the most conserved structure responsible for the posttranslational processing of non-structural polyproteins of this virus. Therefore, it can be the potential target for drug discovery against SARS CoV-2. Twenty-one thousand two hundred and seven chemical compounds used for sequential virtual screening studies including coronavirus screening compounds (Life Chemical database) and antiviral compounds (Asinex database). The Schrodinger suite 2019 employed for high throughput screening, molecular docking and MM-GBSA through the Glide module. Subsequently, 23 compounds were selected in the phase first selection criteria for re-docking with AutoDock and iDock followed by ADMET prediction. The drug-likeness predicted through Lipinski's rule of five, Veber's rule and Muegge's rule. Finally, three ligands were selected for molecular dynamics simulation studies over 150 ns against the main protease of the SARS CoV-2. They showed promising docking scores on Glide, iDock and AutoDock Vina algorithms (ligand F2679-0163: -10.75, -10.29 and -9.2; ligand F6355-0442: -9.38, -8.61 and -7.6; ligand 8250: -9.795, -7.94 and -7.5), respectively. The RMSD parameter remained stable at 2.5 Å for all the three ligands for 150 ns. The high RMSF fluctuations, RoG of around 22 Å and the binding free energy were favorable in each case. The hydrogen bond interactions of 8250, F6355-0442 and F2679-0163 were six, five and three, respectively. These compounds can be further explored for

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HumansMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationPeptide HydrolasesProtease InhibitorsPeptide HydrolasesProtease InhibitorsCOVID-19dockingMain proteasemolecular dynamics simulationSARS CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32715956
PMCPMC7441774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.