ArticleHospital practice (1995)2020
Hospital screening for obstructive sleep apnea in patients admitted to a rural, tertiary care academic hospital with heart failure.
Article in Hospital practice (1995), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03056443 (Initiation of CPAP for Newly Diagnosed OSA in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Initiation of CPAP for Newly Diagnosed OSA in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of obstructive sleep apnea screening questionnaires in hospitalized patients with heart failure.Sleep medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a Novel Shared Care Intervention to Address Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Rural West Virginia.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
- Factors impacting sleep center no-show rates after hospital discharge using geospatial coding in Appalachia.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Article
- Inpatient CPAP adherence may predict post-discharge adherence in hospitalized patients screened high risk for OSA.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2023Article
- Provider Perspectives on Sleep Apnea from Appalachia: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Underrecognition of sleep-disordered breathing and other common health conditions in the West Virginia Medicaid population: a driver of poor health outcomes.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRural communities represent a vulnerable population that would significantly benefit from hospital-based OSA screening given these areas tend to have significant health-care disparities and poor health outcomes. Although inpatient screening has been studied at urban hospitals, no study to date has assessed this approach in rural populations.
methodsThis study utilized the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) to generate a list of potential candidates by employing inclusion/exclusion criteria as screening. Subjects identified were then approached and offered information regarding the study. Screening for OSA entailed a tiered approach utilizing the sleep apnea clinical score (SAC) and portable sleep testing. Individuals identified as high risk (SAC ≥ 15) for OSA underwent evaluation with a portable sleep testing system while hospitalized. All participants with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥5 events/h confirmed by a sleep medicine physician were considered screen positive for OSA. If approved/available, subjects screening positive for OSA were provided with an auto-titrating continuous positive airway pressure (PAP). Patient characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Categorical data were described using contingency tables, including counts and percentages. Continuously scaled measures were summarized by median with range. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT03056443.
resultsNine hundred and fifty-eight potential subjects were identified. The three most common reasons for exclusion included previous OSA diagnosis or exposure to PAP therapy (n = 357), advanced illness (n = 380), and declined participation by the individual (n = 68). The remaining 31 subjects underwent further evaluation for obstructive sleep apnea. Twenty-three subjects had a high sleep apnea clinic score. Per our study protocol, 13 subjects who screened positive for OSA were initiated on APAP therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.