Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32715432›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2020

Commentary: Challenges and Opportunites in the Assessment of Fidelity and Related Constructs.

Shannon Wiltsey Stirman

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Measuring Fidelity to Evidence-Based Practices: Psychometrics.Administration and policy in mental health · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pilot Trial of Online Measurement Training and Feedback in Family Therapy for Adolescent Behavior Problems.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shannon Wiltsey StirmanNational Center for PTSD and Stanford University, 795 Willow Rd, NC-PTSD, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA. Sws1@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9917-5078

Funding

Improving and Sustaining Delivery of CPT for PTSD in Mental Health SystemsR01MH106506 · NIMH · PALO ALTO VETERANS INSTIT FOR RESEARCH · PI MONSON, CANDICE M., WILTSEY STIRMAN, SHANNON · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
Leveraging Routine Clinical Materials and Mobile Technology to Assess CBT QualityR01MH112628 · NIMH · PALO ALTO VETERANS INSTIT FOR RESEARCH · PI WILTSEY STIRMAN, SHANNON · 2017 to 2020
$2.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106506NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH 112628NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeHumansProgram EvaluationAdaptationFidelityImplementation

Identifiers

PMID32715432
PMCPMC10321439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.