Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32715341›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2021

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Dutch and German versions of the Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire in people with rheumatoid arthritis.

Alison Hammond, Jorit Meesters, Karin Niedermann, Alan Tennant, Thea Vliet Vlieland, Sarah Tyson, Ulla Nordenskiöld

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05244824 (Adaptation of Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05244824 unknown statusnot on this map

Adaptation of Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire (EDAQ) Into Turkish, Examining The Reliability and Validity For People With Rheumatoid Arthritis

TypeobservationalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled210ConditionsArthritis, Rheumatoid, Activities of Daily LivingArmsAdaptation into Turkish, Examining The Reliability and Validity for People with RA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Alison HammondCentre for Health Sciences Research, Allerton, University of Salford, Frederick Road, Salford, M6 6PU, UK. a.hammond@salford.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5266-9991
Jorit MeestersDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8665-7887
Karin NiedermannInstitute of Physiotherapy, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), School of Health Professions, Technikumstr. 71, 8401, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Alan TennantLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0728-2130
Thea Vliet VlielandDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6322-3859
Sarah TysonDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6301-8791
Ulla NordenskiöldDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7055-0724
Leiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Salford · GBZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences · CH

Funding

European League Against Rheumatism 009Versus Arthritis 18497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire (EDAQ) is a detailed patient-reported outcome measure of activity ability. The objective of this research was to assess the linguistic and cross-cultural validity and psychometric properties of the EDAQ in rheumatoid arthritis for Dutch and German speakers. The EDAQ was translated into Dutch and German using standard methods. A total of 415 participants (Dutch n = 252; German n = 163) completed two questionnaires about four weeks apart. The first included the EDAQ, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and 36-item Short-Form v2 (SF-36v2) and the second, the EDAQ only. We examined construct validity using Rasch analysis for the two components (Self-Care and Mobility) of the Dutch and German EDAQ. Language invariance was also tested from the English version. We examined internal consistency, concurrent and discriminant validity and test-retest reliability in the 14 EDAQ domains. The Self-Care and Mobility components satisfied Rasch model requirements for fit, unidimensionality and invariance by language. Internal consistency for all 14 domains was mostly good to excellent (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.80). Concurrent validity was mostly strong: HAQ r

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingDisability EvaluationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAgedArthritis, RheumatoidCross-Cultural ComparisonFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPersons with DisabilitiesTranslationsActivities of daily livingOccupational therapyOutcome assessmentRasch analysisRehabilitationRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID32715341
PMCPMC8019417
OpenAlexW3045146046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.