ArticlePediatric surgery international2020
The value of saline-aided ultrasound in diagnosing congenital duodenal obstruction.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Annular Pancreas: Insights Into the Diagnosis of a Rare Anatomical Malformation in Pediatric Patients.Cureus · 2025Article
- Evaluation of prenatal and postnatal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of fetal double bubble sign.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aim of the study is to assess the value of saline-aided ultrasound (US) in diagnosing congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO).
methodsThe neonates with CDO were enrolled in this study, including the neonates confirmed with annular pancreas (AP) by operation, the neonates confirmed with duodenal atresia, the neonates confirmed with duodenum web, and the neonates confirmed with malrotation. Pertinent data were recorded, including the US features, intraoperative findings, and surgical procedures. The methodology of this study is a diagnostic test study which means the US feature is the test and the intraoperative finding is the gold standard.
resultsA total of 95 neonates were enrolled, including 33 neonates with AP, 6 neonates with duodenal atresia, 29 neonates with duodenum web, and 27 neonates with malrotation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the hyperechogenic band for the detection of AP were 78.8% (26/33), 90.3% (56/62), 81.2% (26/32), 88.8% (56/63), and 86.3% (82/95), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and accuracy for the detection of duodenal atresia were 0% (0/6), 100% (89/89), 93.6% (89/95), and 93.6% (89/95), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for the detection of duodenum web were 100% (29/29), 100% (66/66), 100% (29/29), 100% (66/66), and 100% (95/95), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for the detection of malrotation were 100% (27/27), 100% (68/68), 100% (27/27), 100% (68/68), and 100% (95/95), respectively.
conclusionSaline-aided US is a feasible tool to diagnose CDO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.