ArticleContraception: X2020
Unsatisfied contraceptive preferences due to cost among women in the United States.
Article in Contraception: X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining the Associations of Altered Metabolism in Black Women with Endometrial Cancer.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Exploring State- and Individual-Level Characteristics Associated with Perceived Barriers to Accessing Sexual and Reproductive Health Care Among Young Adult Black Women.Journal of sex research · 2026Article
- Contraceptive use and unfulfilled preferences among women ages 15-49 years in the United States, 2022-2023.F&S reports · 2026Article
- Contraceptive care and method use by sexual and gender minority status: insights from a longitudinal panel of sexual and reproductive healthcare patients in Wisconsin.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Contraceptive access and infant health outcomes.Journal of health economics · 2025Article
- Preferred use of contraceptive methods and reasons for non-use: a cross-sectional survey of a sample of Black, Indigenous, and people of colour in the United States.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Meeting Contraceptive Preferences Among Low-Income Postpartum Texans: A Counterfactual Analysis of Pregnancy Trajectories.Studies in family planning · 2025Article
- Measuring Unmet Need for Contraception Using a Person-Centered Algorithm: An Application With a Community-Based Sample of Married Rohingya Women in Bangladesh.Studies in family planning · 2025Article
- How Do We Measure Contraceptive Method Preferences? Evidence From a Scoping Review.Studies in family planning · 2025Article
- Relationship between experiencing a challenge or delay accessing contraception and contraceptive self-efficacy: Data from a 2022 nationally representative online survey.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Patient Preferences or Provider Pressure? The Relationship Between Coercive Contraceptive Care and Preferred Contraceptive Use.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pornography Use and Coitus Interruptus: Is There a Link?Journal of health communication · 2025Article
- Barriers to Preferred Contraception Use in Mississippi.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2025Article
- The pathway to delivering injectable CAB for HIV prevention: strategies from global PrEP leaders leveraging an adapted version of the Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool (ISAT).Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Changes in contraceptive method mix following the Colorado Family Planning Initiative.Contraception · 2024Article
- Unfulfilled and method-specific contraceptive preferences among reproductive-aged contraceptive users in Arizona, Iowa, New Jersey, and Wisconsin.Health services research · 2024Observational
- Estimates of use of preferred contraceptive method in the United States: a population-based study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2024Article
- Use of preferred contraceptive method among young adults in Texas and California: A comparison by state and insurance coverage.PloS one · 2023Article
- Primary and reproductive healthcare access and use among reproductive aged women and female family planning patients in 3 states.PloS one · 2023Article
- What a (Young) Woman Wants: Concurrent Effects of Desire to Avoid Pregnancy and Desire for Sex on Sexual Intercourse and Contraceptive Use.Demography · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo examine prevalence and characteristics associated with cost barriers to preferred contraceptive use. STUDY
designAmong a nationally representative sample of women at risk of unplanned pregnancy in 2015-2017, we used Poisson regression to assess characteristics associated preferring a(nother) method in the absence of cost.
resultsOverall, 22% preferred to use a(nother) method. Women using less-effective methods, who were Black or Hispanic, ages 15-24 and had low incomes, were more likely to report cost barriers.
conclusionsUsing a preferred method is an indicator of access to care and reproductive autonomy. These results provide a benchmark to track the impact of policy changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.