Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32715285›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2020

Biomarkers of liver dysfunction correlate with a prothrombotic and not with a prohaemorrhagic profile in patients with cirrhosis.

Maxime G Zermatten, Montserrat Fraga, Debora Bertaggia Calderara, Alessandro Aliotta, Darius Moradpour, Lorenzo Alberio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Biomarkers of Hepatic Toxicity: An Overview.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Platelets as a Gauge of Liver Disease Kinetics?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maxime G ZermattenDivision of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Montserrat FragaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Debora Bertaggia CalderaraDivision of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alessandro AliottaDivision of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Darius MoradpourDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lorenzo AlberioDivision of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsDifferent liver dysfunction biomarkers are used to assess the bleeding risk of patients with cirrhosis, either as such or included in bleeding risk assessment scores. Since the current model of coagulation in patients with cirrhosis describes a procoagulant tendency with increasing severity according to Child-Pugh stage, we decided to investigate the relation between liver dysfunction biomarkers and thrombin generation. Our aim was to verify their adequacy for bleeding risk assessment.

methodsWe performed a prospective single-centre study including 260 patients with liver cirrhosis. Thrombin generation was measured using ST Genesia® Thrombin Generation System without and with thrombomodulin in order to assess the role of proteins C and S. Relations between thrombin generation and Child-Pugh/model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores, prothrombin time (PT)/international normalised ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), factor V activity, albumin, and total bilirubin were assessed.

resultsThrombomodulin-mediated inhibition of thrombin generation was significantly decreased in patients with liver cirrhosis compared with healthy donors (

conclusionsWorsening liver dysfunction biomarkers reflect an increasing prothrombotic profile in patients with liver cirrhosis. In particular, prolonged PT/INR and aPTT as well as decreasing factor V activity are related to an increasing thrombotic risk and not to an increasing bleeding risk. These parameters should not be used to assess bleeding risk due to haemostatic anomalies in patients with liver cirrhosis. Alternative biomarkers for bleeding risk assessment in patients with liver cirrhosis need to be developed. LAY SUMMARY: We demonstrate that the laboratory parameters used to assess bleeding risk of patients with liver disease,

Indexed as

aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin timeBilirubinBlood coagulation testsCoagulationETP, endogenous thrombin potentialINR, international normalised ratioLiver cirrhosisMELD, model for end-stage liver diseaseNASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitisPFP, platelet-free plasmaPT, prothrombin timeSerum albuminThrombosisTM, thrombomodulinVTE, venous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID32715285
PMCPMC7369360
OpenAlexW3024965677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.