Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32715085›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2020

Development and implementation of the SUM breast cancer cell line functional genomics knowledge base.

Stephen P Ethier, Stephen T Guest, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, Kent Armeson, Robert C Wilson, Kathryn Duchinski, Daniel Couch, Joe W Gray, Christiana Kappler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Omics-Based Investigations of Breast Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen P EthierDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4420-8594
Stephen T GuestDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC USA.
Elizabeth Garrett-MayerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC USA.
Kent ArmesonBiostatistics Core, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC USA.
Robert C WilsonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC USA.
Kathryn DuchinskiDepartment of Computer Science, The College of Charleston, Charleston, SC USA.
Daniel CouchDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC USA.
Joe W GrayDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9225-6756
Christiana KapplerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · USCollege of Charleston · USMUSC Hollings Cancer Center · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several years ago, the SUM panel of human breast cancer cell lines was developed, and these cell lines have been distributed to hundreds of labs worldwide. Our lab and others have developed extensive omics data sets from these cells. More recently, we performed genome-scale shRNA essentiality screens on the entire SUM line panel, as well as on MCF10A cells, MCF-7 cells, and MCF-7LTED cells. These gene essentiality data sets allowed us to perform orthogonal analyses that functionalize the otherwise descriptive genomic data obtained from traditional genomics platforms. To make these omics data sets available to users of the SUM lines, and to allow users to mine these data sets, we developed the SUM Breast Cancer Cell Line Knowledge Base. This knowledge base provides information on the derivation of each cell line, provides protocols for the proper maintenance of the cells, and provides a series of data mining tools that allow rapid identification of the oncogene signatures for each line, the enrichment of KEGG pathways with screen hit and gene expression data, an analysis of protein and phospho-protein expression for the cell lines, as well as a gene search tool and a functional-druggable signature tool. Recently, we expanded our database to include genomic data for an additional 27 commonly used breast cancer cell lines. Thus, the SLKBase provides users with deep insights into the biology of human breast cancer cell lines that can be used to develop strategies for the reverse engineering of individual breast cancer cell lines.

Indexed as

Cancer genomicsCell signalling

Identifiers

PMID32715085
PMCPMC7374090
OpenAlexW3044491821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.