Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32715030›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2020

The retrosplenial cortex and long-term spatial memory: from the cell to the network.

Michal M Milczarek, Seralynne D Vann

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A tripartite view of the posterior cingulate cortex.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Retrosplenial and Hippocampal Synchrony during Retrieval of Old Memories in Macaques.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Time to put the mammillothalamic pathway into context.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Strategy-Specific Patterns ofBrain sciences · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michal M MilczarekSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Seralynne D VannSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Cardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review we briefly outline how lesion studies, temporary inactivation and neural activity assays have helped update functional models of the retrosplenial cortex, a region critical for episodic and spatial memory. We advocate for the continued importance of appropriately designed behavioural studies in the context of novel experimental methods, such as optogenetic and chemogenetic manipulations. At the same time, we caution against the overreliance on any given level of analysis or experimental technique. Complementary, multimodal strategies are required for understanding how the retrosplenial cortex contributes to the formation and storage of memories both at a structural and systems-level.

Identifiers

PMID32715030
PMCPMC7374566
OpenAlexW3011193094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.