Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32715010›Full record

ArticleEarth's future2020

Integrating the Water Planetary Boundary With Water Management From Local to Global Scales.

Samuel C Zipper, Fernando Jaramillo, Lan Wang-Erlandsson, Sarah E Cornell, Tom Gleeson, Miina Porkka, Tiina Häyhä, Anne-Sophie Crépin, Ingo Fetzer, Dieter Gerten and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Earth's future, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Water-Energy-Food Nexus in the Agri-Food Sector: Research Trends and Innovating Practices.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Samuel C ZipperKansas Geological Survey University of Kansas Lawrence KS USA.
Fernando JaramilloDepartment of Physical Geography Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.
Lan Wang-ErlandssonStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.
Sarah E CornellStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.
Tom GleesonDepartment of Civil Engineering University of Victoria Victoria British Columbia Canada.
Miina PorkkaStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.
Tiina HäyhäStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.
Anne-Sophie CrépinStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.
Ingo FetzerStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.
Dieter GertenPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Member of the Leibniz Association Potsdam Germany.
Holger HoffPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Member of the Leibniz Association Potsdam Germany.
Nathanial MatthewsGlobal Resilience Partnership Stockholm Sweden.
Constanza Ricaurte-VillotaInstituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras "José Benito Vives de Andreis" Santa Marta Colombia.
Matti KummuWater and Development Research Group Aalto University Espoo Finland.
Yoshihide WadaInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Laxenburg Austria.
Line GordonStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.
Stockholm Resilience Centre · SEAalto University · FIGlobal Water Partnership · GHInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis · ATJosé Benito Vives de Andréis Marine and Coastal Research Institute · COÖstersjöcentrumPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research · DEStockholm Environment Institute · SEStockholm University · SEUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The planetary boundaries framework defines the "safe operating space for humanity" represented by nine global processes that can destabilize the Earth System if perturbed. The water planetary boundary attempts to provide a global limit to anthropogenic water cycle modifications, but it has been challenging to translate and apply it to the regional and local scales at which water problems and management typically occur. We develop a cross-scale approach by which the water planetary boundary could guide sustainable water management and governance at subglobal contexts defined by physical features (e.g., watershed or aquifer), political borders (e.g., city, nation, or group of nations), or commercial entities (e.g., corporation, trade group, or financial institution). The application of the water planetary boundary at these subglobal contexts occurs via two approaches: (i) calculating

Indexed as

Anthropocenecross‐scaleEarth Systemsplanetary boundarieswater cyclewater management

Identifiers

PMID32715010
PMCPMC7375053
OpenAlexW2999722537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.