Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32714958›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2020

Time taken from primary care referral to a specialist centre diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an opportunity to improve patient outcomes?

Christopher J Brereton, Timothy Wallis, Michelle Casey, Lynn Fox, Katarina Pontopiddan, Diane Laws, Jennifer Graves, Vanessa Titmuss, Sarah Kearney, Sian Evans and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Christopher J BreretonNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8302-702X
Timothy WallisNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Michelle CaseyMater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Lynn FoxMater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Katarina PontopiddanNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Diane LawsThe Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK.
Jennifer GravesDorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorchester, UK.
Vanessa TitmussPortsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
Sarah KearneyIsle of Wight NHS Trust, Newport, UK.
Sian EvansSalisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury, UK.
Alison GroveHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, UK.
Samreen HamidPoole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
Luca RicheldiUniversita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Katherine M A O'ReillyMater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Sophie V FletcherNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Mark G JonesNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID32714958
PMCPMC7369434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.