Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32714870›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

Integrative Network Fusion: A Multi-Omics Approach in Molecular Profiling.

Marco Chierici, Nicole Bussola, Alessia Marcolini, Margherita Francescatto, Alessandro Zandonà, Lucia Trastulla, Claudio Agostinelli, Giuseppe Jurman, Cesare Furlanello

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. TowardsGenes · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Network Analysis of Microarray Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco ChiericiFondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy.
Nicole BussolaFondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy.
Alessia MarcoliniFondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy.
Margherita FrancescattoFondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy.
Alessandro ZandonàNIDEK Technologies Srl, Albignasego (PD), Italy.
Lucia TrastullaMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Claudio AgostinelliUniversity of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Giuseppe JurmanFondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy.
Cesare FurlanelloFondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy.
Fondazione Bruno Kessler · ITUniversity of Trento · ITMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry · DEUniversity of Trieste · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent technological advances and international efforts, such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), have made available several pan-cancer datasets encompassing multiple omics layers with detailed clinical information in large collection of samples. The need has thus arisen for the development of computational methods aimed at improving cancer subtyping and biomarker identification from multi-modal data. Here we apply the Integrative Network Fusion (INF) pipeline, which combines multiple omics layers exploiting Similarity Network Fusion (SNF) within a machine learning predictive framework. INF includes a feature ranking scheme (rSNF) on SNF-integrated features, used by a classifier over juxtaposed multi-omics features (juXT). In particular, we show instances of INF implementing Random Forest (RF) and linear Support Vector Machine (LSVM) as the classifier, and two baseline RF and LSVM models are also trained on juXT. A compact RF model, called rSNFi, trained on the intersection of top-ranked biomarkers from the two approaches juXT and rSNF is finally derived. All the classifiers are run in a 10x5-fold cross-validation schema to warrant reproducibility, following the guidelines for an unbiased Data Analysis Plan by the US FDA-led initiatives MAQC/SEQC. INF is demonstrated on four classification tasks on three multi-modal TCGA oncogenomics datasets. Gene expression, protein expression and copy number variants are used to predict estrogen receptor status (BRCA-ER,

Indexed as

classificationmulti-omicsnetworkoncogenomicspredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID32714870
PMCPMC7340129
OpenAlexW3039127696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.