Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32714778›Full record

ReviewPreventive medicine reports2020

Interventions to increase uptake of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in minority populations: A systematic review.

Breanne E Lott, Babasola O Okusanya, Elizabeth J Anderson, Nidal A Kram, Melina Rodriguez, Cynthia A Thomson, Cecilia Rosales, John E Ehiri

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Preventive medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Identifying HPV vaccination research priorities for the US.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Breanne E LottDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zukerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Babasola O OkusanyaDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zukerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Elizabeth J AndersonDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zukerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Nidal A KramDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zukerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Melina RodriguezDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zukerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Cynthia A ThomsonCanyon Ranch Center for Prevention and Health Promotion, Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zukerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Cecilia RosalesDivision of Public Health Practice and Translational Research, Mel and Enid Zukerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
John E EhiriDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zukerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
University of Arizona · US

Funding

Student Transformative Experiences to Progress Under-represented Professionals (STEP-UP)R25CA217725 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BEA, JENNIFER WRIGHT, THOMSON, CYNTHIA A. · 2017 to 2022
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA217725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minority youth represent a unique population for public health interventions given the social, economic, and cultural barriers they often face in accessing health services. Interventions to increase uptake of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in minority youth have the potential to reduce disparities in HPV infection and HPV-related cancers. This systematic review assesses the effectiveness of interventions to increase HPV vaccine uptake, measured as vaccine series initiation and series completion, among adolescents and young adults, aged 9-26 years old, identifying as a racial and ethnic minority or sexual and gender minority (SGM) group in high-income countries. Of the 3013 citations produced by a systematic search of three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) in November 2018, nine studies involving 9749 participants were selected for inclusion. All studies were conducted in the United States and were published from 2015 to 2018. Interventions utilized education, vaccine appointment reminders, and negotiated interviewing to increase vaccination. Participants were Black or African American (44.4%), Asian (33.3%), Hispanic or Latinx (22.2%), American Indian or Alaska Native (11.1%), and SGM (22.2%). Studies enrolled parent-child dyads (33.3%), parents alone (11.1%), and youth alone (55.6%). Vaccine series initiation ranged from 11.1% to 84% and series completion ranged from 5.6% to 74.2% post-intervention. Educational and appointment reminder interventions may improve HPV vaccine series initiation and completion in minority youth in the U.S. Given the lack of high quality, adequately powered studies, further research is warranted to identify effective strategies for improving HPV vaccine uptake for minority populations.

Indexed as

Cancer preventionHealth disparitiesIntervention studiesMinority populationPapillomavirus vaccineSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32714778
PMCPMC7372149
OpenAlexW3041803295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.