ArticleCureus2020
Rapid Shallow Breathing Index as a Predictor of Extubation Outcomes in Pediatric Patients Underwent Cardiac Surgeries at King Faisal Cardiac Center.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid Shallow Breathing Index as a Predictor of Extubation Outcomes After Pediatric Cardiac Surgeries.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Monitoring During Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation in Children: The WeanCOPediatric pulmonology · 2025Article
- Predictive parameters and model for extubation outcome in pediatric patients.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Weaning patients of ventilation is an important step in the intensive care unit; therefore, assessing the perfect timing to do such critical action is of equal significance to prevent complications. Rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) has been used as a prediction tool for weaning adult patients, but for pediatric patients it is still an area of unclarity. Accordingly, the aim of this study is to evaluate the RSBI as a predictor of extubation outcome in pediatric patients underwent cardiac surgery at King Faisal Cardiac Center from 2016 until 2019. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Faisal Cardiac Center on all extubated children having cardiac surgeries from 2016 to 2019 with excluding the patients who were admitted for causes other than cardiac surgery. Their age was ranged from birth until 14 years. Moreover, the patients were grouped based on the extubation outcomes into: success, success with non-invasive ventilation, or failure which was defined as reintubation within 48 hours after extubation. Regarding the collected data, three readings of RSBI on hourly basis prior to extubation were calculated by dividing respiratory rate (RR) over tidal volume (VT) with a correction based on the body weight. Results A total of 86 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thirty (34.9%) patients were successfully extubated, 51 (59.3%) patients had successful extubation with the use of non-invasive ventilation, and only five (5.8%) patients suffered from extubation failure. Two-hour RSBI as a predictor of outcome had a P-value of 0.003, one-hour RSBI had a P-value of 0.01, RSBI at time of extubation had a P-value of 0.02. Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) is higher in extubation failure group with a p-value of 0.01. Conclusion This study suggests that pediatric patients who suffer from extubation failure usually have a higher RSBI measurement compared to the patients who have a successful extubation. The most significant RSBI measurements to predict the extubation outcome were recorded two hours prior to extubation. Our study also found that extubation failure patients could have higher MCV than the success group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.