ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2020
Quantitative evaluation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy by using intraepidermal electrical stimulation.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a frequently observed treatment-related adverse effect, particularly associated with taxane-based chemotherapy, which affects the quality of life of the patients. To date, CIPN has been subjectively evaluated by patients or physicians. Intraepidermal electrical stimulation (IES) may be applied to evaluate the function of small fibers by measuring pain threshold, and assess the degree of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate CIPN objectively by using IES. The pain threshold measured by IES in patients with gynecological cancer who underwent taxane-based chemotherapy was compared with the clinical grading scale of peripheral neuropathy (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0). A total of 57 patients were evaluated (151 measurements). The median age of the patients was 63 years. The number of measurements with clinical grades of 0, 1 and ≥2 was 49, 57 and 45, respectively. The mean pain threshold was 0.1, 0.14 and 0.18 mA for grades 0, 1 and ≥2, respectively. Therefore, the mean pain threshold significantly increased with the progression of the clinical grade. The measurement of pain threshold by using IES may be a reliable indicator for quantitative evaluation of CIPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.