Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32714474›Full record

ArticleCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental2020

Parental Experience of Potential Adverse Drug Reactions Related to Their Oral Administration of Antipyretic Analgesic Medicines in Children in Saudi Arabia.

Mansour Tobaiqy, Katie MacLure, Mansoor Radwi, Ashwaq M Almalki, Ahmed H Alhasan, Maya Tannoury, Zouhair Attieh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mansour TobaiqyDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, P.O. Box 45311 Jeddah 21512, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Katie MacLureSchool of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Mansoor RadwiDepartment of Hematology, College of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Ashwaq M AlmalkiDepartment of Ophthalmology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed H AlhasanDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, P.O. Box 45311 Jeddah 21512, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Maya TannouryFaculty of Health Sciences, American University of Science and Technology, Beirut, Lebanon.
Zouhair AttiehFaculty of Health Sciences, American University of Science and Technology, Beirut, Lebanon.
University of Jeddah · SAAmerican University of Science and Technology · LBKing Abdulaziz Medical City · SARobert Gordon University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral antipyretic analgesic medicines are commonly used in children and have the potential for adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

objectiveThe aim of this study was to explore parental experiences of potential ADRs related to their oral administration of antipyretic analgesics in children in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

methodsFor this cross-sectional survey, a paper-based questionnaire, consent form and information sheet were handed out to 1000 parents who had administered an oral antipyretic analgesic medicine to their children during the previous 3 months. Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM-SPSS Inc, Armonk, NY). Simple descriptive and inferential statistics were used. Management and ethical approvals were attained.

resultsDuring March to April 2017, 661 parents agreed to participate, giving a response rate of 66.1%. Of the surveyed sample, 208 parents had observed 1 or more potential ADRs (31.5%, n = 208 out of 661). Parents' (n = 208) most commonly reported potential ADRs (n = 523) were loss of appetite (23%, n = 120 out of 523), stomachache (20.3%, n = 106 out of 523), abdominal colic (13%, n = 68 out of 523), and diarrhea (10.3%, n = 54 out of 523). Parents described severity of the ADRs as slight (71.8%, n = 342 out of 476), annoying to the child (7.9%, n = 85 to of 476), significant and affecting daily tasks (3.6%, n = 17 out of 476) and significant and led to the hospital (6.7%, n = 32 out of 476). Fever was the top-ranked reason for using antipyretic analgesic medicines (41.0%, n = 271 out of 661), followed by toothache (25.0%, n = 165 out of 661) and tonsillitis/laryngitis (24.7%, n = 163 out of 661). Among parents, 34.7% (n = 165 out of 476) did not seek medical attention when a potential ADR occurred, whereas 26.3% (n = 125 out of 476) of parents took their children to hospital clinics.

conclusionsAlthough the majority of parentally reported (but not proven) ADRs were mild, a number of significant ADRs were reported. Future research should consider whether there is a role for physicians and pharmacists in educating parents in Saudi Arabia, and perhaps more widely, about the optimal use of oral antipyretic and analgesic medicines in children. (

Indexed as

adverse drug reactionsantipyretic analgesicschildrenparentssurvey

Identifiers

PMID32714474
PMCPMC7378853
OpenAlexW3036170784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.