Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32714431›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2020

Multimodal MRI Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Using Sparse Subspace Clustering Algorithm.

Li Liu, Liang Kuang, Yunfeng Ji

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Machine learning and deep learning for brain tumor MRI image segmentation.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. A Novel Stress State Assessment Method for College Students Based on EEG.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Li LiuSchool of IoT Engineering, Jiangsu Vocational College of Information Technology, Wuxi 214153, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3925-8741
Liang KuangSchool of IoT Engineering, Jiangsu Vocational College of Information Technology, Wuxi 214153, China.
Yunfeng JiSchool of IoT Engineering, Jiangsu Vocational College of Information Technology, Wuxi 214153, China.
Wuxi Vocational Institute of Commerce · CNNanjing University of Information Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumors are one of the most deadly diseases with a high mortality rate. The shape and size of the tumor are random during the growth process. Brain tumor segmentation is a brain tumor assisted diagnosis technology that separates different brain tumor structures such as edema and active and tumor necrosis tissues from normal brain tissue. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology has the advantages of no radiation impact on the human body, good imaging effect on structural tissues, and an ability to realize tomographic imaging of any orientation. Therefore, doctors often use MRI brain tumor images to analyze and process brain tumors. In these images, the tumor structure is only characterized by grayscale changes, and the developed images obtained by different equipment and different conditions may also be different. This makes it difficult for traditional image segmentation methods to deal well with the segmentation of brain tumor images. Considering that the traditional single-mode MRI brain tumor images contain incomplete brain tumor information, it is difficult to segment the single-mode brain tumor images to meet clinical needs. In this paper, a sparse subspace clustering (SSC) algorithm is introduced to process the diagnosis of multimodal MRI brain tumor images. In the absence of added noise, the proposed algorithm has better advantages than traditional methods. Compared with the top 15 in the Brats 2015 competition, the accuracy is not much different, being basically stable between 10 and 15. In order to verify the noise resistance of the proposed algorithm, this paper adds 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% Gaussian noise to the test image. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm has better noise immunity than a comparable algorithm.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrain NeoplasmsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyComputer SimulationFuzzy LogicHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMathematical ConceptsModels, NeurologicalMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID32714431
PMCPMC7355351
OpenAlexW3040244702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.