Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32714384›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2020

Plasticity of the Primary Motor Cortex in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors.

Nathan W Kong, William R Gibb, Suvarna Badhe, Benjamin P Liu, Matthew C Tate

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06381726 (Personalized Rendering of Motor System Functional Plasticity Potential to Improve Glioma Resection and Quality of Life), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06381726 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Personalized Rendering of Motor System Functional Plasticity Potential to Improve Glioma Resection and Quality of Life

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MilanRan2024 to 2028Enrolled400ConditionsGlioma, Glioma, MalignantArmsResting State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI), Up-front Motor Rehabilitation, Up-front Chemotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan W KongDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
William R GibbDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Suvarna BadheDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Benjamin P LiuDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Matthew C TateDepartments of Neurological Surgery and Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0206-7722
Northwestern University · USStanford University · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are two neuron-level mechanisms proposed to underlie neural plasticity: recruiting neurons nearby to support the lost function (ipsilesional plasticity) and uncovering latent pathways that can assume the function that was lost (contralesional plasticity). While both patterns have been demonstrated in patient groups following injury, the specific mechanisms underlying each mode of plasticity are poorly understood. In a retrospective case series of 13 patients, we utilize a novel paradigm that analyzes serial fMRI scans in patients harboring intrinsic brain tumors that vary in location and growth kinetics to better understand the mechanisms underlying these two modes of plasticity in the human primary motor cortex. Twelve patients in our series had some degree of primary motor cortex plasticity, an area previously thought to have limited plasticity. Patients harboring smaller lesions with slower growth kinetics and increasing distance from the primary motor region demonstrated recruitment of ipsilateral motor regions. Conversely, larger, faster-growing lesions in close proximity to the primary motor region were associated with activation of the contralesional primary motor cortex, along with increased activation of the supplementary motor area. These data increase our understanding of the adaptive abilities of the brain and may lead to improved treatment strategies for those suffering from motor loss secondary to brain injuries.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsRecovery of FunctionRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32714384
PMCPMC7354670
OpenAlexW3039424567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.