Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32714326›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2020

Mechanisms of Particles in Sensitization, Effector Function and Therapy of Allergic Disease.

Isabella Anna Joubert, Mark Geppert, Litty Johnson, Robert Mills-Goodlet, Sara Michelini, Evgeniia Korotchenko, Albert Duschl, Richard Weiss, Jutta Horejs-Höck, Martin Himly

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isabella Anna JoubertDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Mark GeppertDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Litty JohnsonDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Robert Mills-GoodletDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Sara MicheliniDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Evgeniia KorotchenkoDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Albert DuschlDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Richard WeissDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Jutta Horejs-HöckDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Martin HimlyDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
University of Salzburg · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans have always been in contact with natural airborne particles from many sources including biologic particulate matter (PM) which can exhibit allergenic properties. With industrialization, anthropogenic and combustion-derived particles have become a major fraction. Currently, an ever-growing number of diverse and innovative materials containing engineered nanoparticles (NPs) are being developed with great expectations in technology and medicine. Nanomaterials have entered everyday products including cosmetics, textiles, electronics, sports equipment, as well as food, and food packaging. As part of natural evolution humans have adapted to the exposure to particulate matter, aiming to protect the individual's integrity and health. At the respiratory barrier, complications can arise, when allergic sensitization and pulmonary diseases occur in response to particle exposure. Particulate matter in the form of plant pollen, dust mites feces, animal dander, but also aerosols arising from industrial processes in occupational settings including diverse mixtures thereof can exert such effects. This review article gives an overview of the allergic immune response and addresses specifically the mechanisms of particulates in the context of allergic sensitization, effector function and therapy. In regard of the first theme (i), an overview on exposure to particulates and the functionalities of the relevant immune cells involved in allergic sensitization as well as their interactions in innate and adaptive responses are described. As relevant for human disease, we aim to outline (ii) the potential effector mechanisms that lead to the aggravation of an ongoing immune deviation (such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, etc.) by inhaled particulates, including NPs. Even though adverse effects can be exerted by (nano)particles, leading to allergic sensitization, and the exacerbation of allergic symptoms, promising potential has been shown for their use in (iii) therapeutic approaches of allergic disease, for example as adjuvants. Hence, allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is introduced and the role of adjuvants such as alum as well as the current understanding of their mechanisms of action is reviewed. Finally, future prospects of nanomedicines in allergy treatment are described, which involve modern platform technologies combining immunomodulatory effects at several (immuno-)functional levels.

Indexed as

AllergensHumansHypersensitivityParticulate MatterAllergensParticulate Matteradjuvantsalumanimal danderhouse dust mite fecesimmunomodulationmold sporesnanomedicinepollen

Identifiers

PMID32714326
PMCPMC7344151
OpenAlexW3038967057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.