Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32714310›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

NAuRA: Genomic Tool to Identify Staphylococcal Enterotoxins in

Déborah Merda, Arnaud Felten, Noémie Vingadassalon, Sarah Denayer, Yacine Titouche, Lucia Decastelli, Bernadette Hickey, Christos Kourtis, Hristo Daskalov, Michel-Yves Mistou and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Isolation of community-associated methicillin-resistantOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Genomic Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Déborah MerdaFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), University of Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Arnaud FeltenFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), University of Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Noémie VingadassalonFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), University of Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Sarah DenayerScientific Service of FoodBorne Pathogens, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Yacine TitoucheLaboratory of Analytical Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Mouloud Mammeri, Tizi Ouzou, Algeria.
Lucia DecastelliNational Reference Laboratory for Coagulase-Positive Including Staphylococcus aureus, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d'Aosta, Turin, Italy.
Bernadette HickeyDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Kildare, Ireland.
Christos KourtisState General Laboratory, Food Microbiology Laboratory, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Hristo DaskalovNational Center of Food Safety, NDRVI, BFSA, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Michel-Yves MistouFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), University of Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Jacques-Antoine HennekinneFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), University of Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Paris-Est Sup · FRAgence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FRBulgarian Food Safety Agency · BGDepartment of Agriculture Food and the Marine · IEIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte Liguria e Valle d'Aosta · ITMouloud Mammeri University of Tizi-Ouzou · DZNicosia General Hospital · CYSciensano (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food contamination by staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) is responsible for many food poisoning outbreaks (FPOs) each year, and they represent the third leading cause of FPOs in Europe. SEs constitute a protein family with 27 proteins. However, enzyme immunoassays can only detect directly in food the five classical SEs (SEA-SEE). Thus, molecular characterization methods of strains found in food are now used for FPO investigations. Here, we describe the development and implementation of a genomic analysis tool called NAuRA (Nice automatic Research of alleles) that can detect the presence of 27 SEs genes in just one analysis- and create a database of allelic data and protein variants for harmonizing analyses. This tool uses genome assembly data and the 27 protein sequences of SEs. To include the different divergence levels between SE-coding genes, parameters of coverage and identity were generated from 10,000 simulations and a dataset of 244 assembled genomes from strains responsible for outbreaks in Europe as well as the RefSeq reference database. Based on phylogenetic inference performed using maximum-likelihood on the core genomes of the strains in this collection, we demonstrated that strains responsible for FPOs are distributed throughout the phylogenetic tree. Moreover, 71 toxin profiles were obtained using the NAuRA pipeline and these profiles do not follow the evolutionary history of strains. This study presents a pioneering method to investigate strains isolated from food at the genomic level and to analyze the diversity of all 27 SE-coding genes together.

Indexed as

bioinformatics toolgene detectiongenomicstaphylococcal enterotoxins genesvariant diversity

Identifiers

PMID32714310
PMCPMC7344154
OpenAlexW3037658172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.