ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2020
Neurocognitive Dysfunctions and Their Therapeutic Modulation in Patients With Methamphetamine Dependence: A Pilot Study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extensive frontal cortex abnormalities and cognitive impairment in methamphetamine use disorder: a comprehensive 3T structural MRI analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Effect of Overdose-Induced Hypoxia on Neurocognitive Performance in Individuals With Opioid Dependence: A Prospective Multicenter Study.Alpha psychiatry · 2026Article
- The Diagnosis and Treatment of Stimulant-Related Emergencies.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Review
- Impulsive suicide in methamphetamine intoxication and self-reported ADHD: a case report.Der Nervenarzt · 2025Article
- Effects of methamphetamine on delay discounting in rats using concurrent chains.Learning & behavior · 2025Review
- RNA sequencing analysis identifies sex differences in transcriptional signatures in the dorsal striatum of female and male rats after withdrawal from methamphetamine self-administration.Neurochemistry international · 2025Article
- Evaluating Impulsivity as a Mechanism of Behaviour Change for 12-step Engagement during Alcohol Use Disorder Recovery.Research square · 2025Article
- Incubation of methamphetamine craving in punishment-resistant individuals is associated with activation of specific gene networks in the rat dorsal striatum.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Article
- Treatment outcome, cognitive function, and psychopathology in methamphetamine users compared to other substance users.World journal of psychiatry · 2022Article
- Housing Correlates in Pregnant and Parenting Women Using Methamphetamine and Accessing Psychiatric Care.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Probabilistic Reversal Learning Deficits in Patients With Methamphetamine Use Disorder-A Longitudinal Pilot Study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimMethamphetamine (MA) abuse and dependence are increasing worldwide and are commonly associated with cognitive deficits. Some studies indicate that such impairments can improve if users become abstinent, but overall results remain inconclusive. Hence, we have performed a longitudinal case-control study investigating key surrogates for attention and impulsive decision-making before and after treatment.
methodsThirty patients with MA dependence and 24 non-substance-abusing control participants were recruited. Groups were matched on age, sex and education. All subjects performed a baseline assessment to obtain neurocognitive measures of sustained attention and delay discounting. Patients subsequently participated in an MA-specific relapse prevention program including repeated monitoring of relapse status. After 3 months, participants of both groups were reevaluated for neurocognitive performance.
resultsAt baseline, MA patients showed a significantly higher number of omissions compared to controls, indicative of lower sustained attention. Interestingly, we observed a steep decrease of omissions in MA patients to control-group level post treatment. On the other hand, MA patients discounted delayed rewards significantly stronger than controls, indicating a more impulsive choice behavior both before and after treatment. LIMITATION: The results should be interpreted with care because of the small sample and short follow-up period.
conclusionOur data support earlier findings on partial recovery of cognitive deficits in MA patients. They also strengthen the indication for recently recommended psychotherapeutic interventions and may provide a behavioral monitoring tool to inform treatment progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.