Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32714215›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2020

Neurocognitive Dysfunctions and Their Therapeutic Modulation in Patients With Methamphetamine Dependence: A Pilot Study.

Nadine Bernhardt, Johannes Petzold, Cornelius Groß, Anna Scheck, Shakoor Pooseh, René Mayer-Pelinski, Ulrich S Zimmermann, Michael N Smolka, Maximilian Pilhatsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Stimulant-Related Emergencies.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nadine BernhardtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Johannes PetzoldDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Cornelius GroßDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Anna ScheckDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Shakoor PoosehFreiburg Center for Data Analysis and Modeling, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
René Mayer-PelinskiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Ulrich S ZimmermannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Michael N SmolkaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Maximilian PilhatschDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimMethamphetamine (MA) abuse and dependence are increasing worldwide and are commonly associated with cognitive deficits. Some studies indicate that such impairments can improve if users become abstinent, but overall results remain inconclusive. Hence, we have performed a longitudinal case-control study investigating key surrogates for attention and impulsive decision-making before and after treatment.

methodsThirty patients with MA dependence and 24 non-substance-abusing control participants were recruited. Groups were matched on age, sex and education. All subjects performed a baseline assessment to obtain neurocognitive measures of sustained attention and delay discounting. Patients subsequently participated in an MA-specific relapse prevention program including repeated monitoring of relapse status. After 3 months, participants of both groups were reevaluated for neurocognitive performance.

resultsAt baseline, MA patients showed a significantly higher number of omissions compared to controls, indicative of lower sustained attention. Interestingly, we observed a steep decrease of omissions in MA patients to control-group level post treatment. On the other hand, MA patients discounted delayed rewards significantly stronger than controls, indicating a more impulsive choice behavior both before and after treatment. LIMITATION: The results should be interpreted with care because of the small sample and short follow-up period.

conclusionOur data support earlier findings on partial recovery of cognitive deficits in MA patients. They also strengthen the indication for recently recommended psychotherapeutic interventions and may provide a behavioral monitoring tool to inform treatment progress.

Indexed as

crystal methdelay discountingmethamphetaminepsychotherapysustained attention

Identifiers

PMID32714215
PMCPMC7343893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.