ReviewAggression and violent behavior
Prevalence of intimate partner violence perpetration among military populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Aggression and violent behavior. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Factors That Contribute to Dysfunctional Behavior in Active Military Personnel: An Umbrella Review.Trauma, violence & abuse · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in Military and Veteran Populations: A Systematic Review of Population-Based Surveys and Population Screening Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- The mental health and wellbeing of spouses, partners and children of emergency responders: A systematic review.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Examining Overlap in Nonpartner Aggression and Intimate Partner Violence Among Veterans.Violence and victims · 2026Trial
- Feasibility, acceptability, and short-term impact of a brief sexually transmitted infection intervention targeting U.S. Military personnel and family members.BMC public health · 2022Trial
- Assessing Personal and Family Strengths Among Active-Duty Military Members to Predict Self-Directed Harm and Interpersonal Violence.Journal of interpersonal violence · 2026Article
- What do the Public Understand About Intimate Partner Violence in the Context of Military Veteran Status and PTSD?Psychological reports · 2025Article
- Mental and physical health, impulse control, and intimate partner violence within a veteran sample.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Perceptions of the impact of military life on relationships and Intimate Partner Violence and Abuse among UK military personnel.PloS one · 2025Article
- State Efforts to Enforce Firearm Dispossession Through Relinquishment Laws.Criminology & public policy · 2024Article
- Political organization and gender predict violence in the Andean archaeological record.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Predictors of veteran attendance in an intimate partner violence intervention.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2024Article
- Improving Health Professional Recognition and Response to Child Maltreatment and Intimate Partner Violence: Protocol for Two Mixed Methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trials.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Intimate partner violence perpetration among veterans: associations with neuropsychiatric symptoms and limbic microstructure.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Intimate Partner Violence Within the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Associations Among Veterans.Psychology of violence · 2024Article
- Examining gender and sexual orientation differences in physical intimate partner violence experienced and perpetrated by youth living in eThekwini district South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Screening for Intimate Partner Violence Experience and Use in the Veterans Health Administration.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Study protocol for a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial to reduce risky drinking among service members and their partners.Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Article
- Intimate Partner Violence inInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global health issue that impacts both civilian and military populations. Factors associated with military service may result in increased risk of IPV perpetration among Veterans and Active Duty military personnel. Six bibliographic databases were searched to identify studies that estimated the prevalence of IPV perpetration among military populations by sociodemographic and military characteristics. Where possible, random effect meta-analyses were conducted to determine pooled prevalence estimates. 42 studies were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review. 28 of these studies met the requirements for inclusion in subsequent meta-analyses. Among studies that measured past-year physical IPV perpetration, the pooled prevalence was higher among men compared to women (26% and 20% respectively). Among Veterans, there were consistently higher prevalences compared to Active Duty samples. Similarly, higher prevalences were found among studies in general military settings compared to clinical settings. Further research that considers the impact of the act(s) of IPV perpetration on the victims is needed. This, along with the use of a consistent measurement tools across studies will help to develop a stronger evidence base to inform prevention and management programs for all types of IPV perpetration among military personnel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.