ArticleBreeding science2020
SSR markers developed using next-generation sequencing technology in pineapple,
Article in Breeding science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of QTLs controlling hydrolyzable tannin contents derived from a wild tea relative,Breeding science · 2025Article
- Generation and characterization of novel transcriptome-derived SSR markers for genetic applications in blueberry.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Streamlining of Simple Sequence Repeat Data Mining Methodologies and Pipelines for Crop Scanning.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers provide a reliable tool for the identification of accessions and the construction of genetic linkage maps because of their co-dominant inheritance. In the present study, we developed new SSR markers with next-generation sequencing using the Roche 454 GS FLX+ platform. Five hundred SSR primer sets were tested for the genetic identification of pineapple, including 100 each for the di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotide motif SSRs. In total, 160 SSR markers successfully amplified fragments and exhibited polymorphism among accessions. The SSR markers revealed the number of alleles per locus (ranging from 2 to 13), the expected heterozygosity (ranging from 0.041 to 0.823), and the observed heterozygosity (ranging from 0 to 0.875). A total of 117 SSR markers with tri- or greater nucleotide motifs were shown to be effective at facilitating accurate genotyping. Using the SSR markers, 25 accessions were distinguished genetically, with the exception of accessions 'MD-2' and 'Yonekura'. The developed SSR markers could facilitate the establishment of efficient and accurate genetic identification systems and the construction of genetic linkage maps in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.