Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32713858›Full record

ArticleJournal of biosciences2020

PRIGSA2: Improved version of protein repeat identification by graph spectral analysis.

Broto Chakrabarty, Nita Parekh

Abstract read
PubMed
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. DbStRiPs: Database of structural repeats in proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Broto ChakrabartyCentre for Computational Natural Science and Bioinformatics, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Nita Parekh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tandemly repeated structural motifs in proteins form highly stable structural folds and provide multiple binding sites associated with diverse functional roles. The tertiary structure and function of these proteins are determined by the type and copy number of the repeating units. Each repeat type exhibits a unique pattern of intra- and inter-repeat unit interactions that is well-captured by the topological features in the network representation of protein structures. Here we present an improved version of our graph based algorithm, PRIGSA, with structure-based validation and filtering steps incorporated for accurate detection of tandem structural repeats. The algorithm integrates available knowledge on repeat families with de novo prediction to detect repeats in single monomer chains as well as in multimeric protein complexes. Three levels of performance evaluation are presented: comparison with state-of-the-art algorithms on benchmark dataset of repeat and nonrepeat proteins, accuracy in the detection of members of 13 known repeat families reported in UniProt and execution on the complete Protein Data Bank to show its ability to identify previously uncharacterized proteins. A ~3-fold increase in the coverage of the members of 13 known families and 3408 novel uncharacterized structural repeat proteins are identified on executing it on PDB. PRIGSA2 is available at http:// bioinf.iiit.ac.in/PRIGSA2/.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsBinding SitesComputer SimulationDatabases, ProteinHumansModels, MolecularProteinsRepetitive Sequences, Amino AcidProteins

Identifiers

PMID32713858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.