Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32713855›Full record

ArticleJournal of biosciences2020

Cardiac differentiation of bone-marrow-resident c-kit

Ezzatollah Fathi, Raheleh Farahzadi, Ilja Vietor, Sara Javanmardi

Abstract read
PubMed
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Stem cells-derived exosomes as cardiac regenerative agents.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ezzatollah FathiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Raheleh Farahzadi
Ilja Vietor
Sara Javanmardi
University of Tabriz · IRInnsbruck Medical University · ATTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The idea of regenerating lost myocardium via cell-based therapies remains as highly considerable. C-kit? stem/ progenitor cells are represented to be suitable candidates for cardiac regeneration compared to other stem cells. A multitude of cytokines from these cells are known to give such multifunctional properties; however, the associated mechanisms of these factors are yet to be totally understood. The aim of the present study was to investigate the

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Marrow CellsCarnitineCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyFlow CytometryHeartHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor IInterleukin-6Mesenchymal Stem CellsMyocytes, CardiacProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitRegenerationTransforming Growth Factor betaVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ACarnitineInsulin-Like Growth Factor IInterleukin-6Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitTransforming Growth Factor betaVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID32713855
OpenAlexW3038356178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.