Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32713836›Full record

ArticleESMO open2020

Feasibility of high-throughput sequencing in clinical routine cancer care: lessons from the cancer pilot project of the France Genomic Medicine 2025 plan.

FGM 2025 Workflow Study Group (Alliance nationale des Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé), Céline Auzanneau, Delphine Bacq, Carine Bellera, Hélène Blons, Anne Boland, Marlène Boucheix, Aurélien Bourdon, Emmanuelle Chollet, Christine Chomienne and 23 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03546127 completednot on this map

Molecular Profiling to Improve Outcome of Patients in Cancer. A Pilot Study (MULTIPLI-0)

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceRan2017 to 2017Enrolled24ConditionsColorectal Carcinoma, Soft Tissue SarcomaArmsNext Generation Sequencing (NGS): exome, RNA seq
NCT03784014 phase3completednot on this map

Molecular Profiling of Advanced Soft-tissue Sarcomas. A Phase III Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceRan2019 to 2026Enrolled603ConditionsSoft Tissue SarcomaArmsNilotinib, Ceritinib, Capmatinib, Lapatinib, Trametinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

FGM 2025 Workflow Study Group (Alliance nationale des Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé)
Céline AuzanneauUnité de pathologie moléculaire, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Delphine BacqCentre national de recherche en génétique humaine, Institut de biologie François-Jacob, Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives, Evry, France.
Carine BelleraInstitut de santé publique, d'épidémiologie et de développement, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Hélène BlonsService de pharmacogénétique et d'oncologie moléculaire, Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Anne BolandCentre national de recherche en génétique humaine, Institut de biologie François-Jacob, Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives, Evry, France.
Marlène BoucheixUnité de pathologie moléculaire, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Aurélien BourdonU1218, Institut Bergonié, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Bordeaux, France.
Emmanuelle CholletITMO Cancer, Alliance nationale pour les sciences de la vie et de la santé, Paris, France.
Christine ChomienneITMO Cancer, Alliance nationale pour les sciences de la vie et de la santé, Paris, France christine.chomienne@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-5513-5752
Jean-François DeleuzeCentre national de recherche en génétique humaine, Institut de biologie François-Jacob, Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives, Evry, France.
Christelle DelmasInstitut de santé publique, Pôle recherche clinique, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Paris, France.
Derek DinartInstitut de santé publique, d'épidémiologie et de développement, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Hélène EspérouInstitut de santé publique, Pôle recherche clinique, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Paris, France.
Flore GeillonFédération francophone de cancérologie digestive, Dijon, France.
Damien GenesteU1218, Institut Bergonié, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Bordeaux, France.
Antoine ItalianoU1218, Institut Bergonié, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Bordeaux, France.
Delphine JeanCIC-EC1401/EUCLID, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Bordeaux, France.
Emmanuel KhalifaUnité de pathologie moléculaire, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Yec'han LaizetU1218, Institut Bergonié, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Bordeaux, France.
Pierre Laurent-PuigU1147, Centre universitaire des Saint-Pères, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Paris, France.
Franck LethimonnierITMO Technologies pour la santé, Alliance nationale pour les sciences de la vie et de la santé, Paris, France.
Claire Lévy-MarchalInstitut de santé publique, Pôle recherche clinique, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Paris, France.
Carlo LucchesiU1218, Institut Bergonié, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6657-2341
Carine MalleInstitut de santé publique, Pôle recherche clinique, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Paris, France.
Pierre ManciniU1218, Institut Bergonié, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Bordeaux, France.
Simone Mathoulin-PélissierInstitut de santé publique, d'épidémiologie et de développement, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Vincent MeyerCentre national de recherche en génétique humaine, Institut de biologie François-Jacob, Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives, Evry, France.
Palomares Marie-AngeCentre national de recherche en génétique humaine, Institut de biologie François-Jacob, Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives, Evry, France.
Géraldine PerkinsU1147, Centre universitaire des Saint-Pères, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Paris, France.
Sabrina Sellan-AlbertInstitut de santé publique, d'épidémiologie et de développement, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Isabelle SoubeyranUnité de pathologie moléculaire, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Cédric WalletInstitut de santé publique, d'épidémiologie et de développement, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhole exome sequencing and RNA sequencing (WES/RNASeq) should now be implemented in the clinical practice in order to increase access to optimal care for cancer patients. Providing results to Tumour Boards in a relevant time frame-that is, compatible with the clinical pathway-is crucial. Assessing the feasibility of this implementation in the French care system is the primary objective of the Multipli study, as one of the four pilot projects of the national France Genomic Medicine 2025 (FGM 2025) plan. The Multipli study encompasses two innovative trials which will be driven in around 2400 patients suffering from a soft-tissue sarcoma (Multisarc) or a metastatic colorectal carcinoma (Acompli).

methodsPrior to launching the FGM 2025 cancer pilot study itself, the performance of the Multipli genomic workflow has been evaluated through each step, from the samples collection to the Molecular Tumour Board (MTB) report. Two Multipli-assigned INCa-labelled molecular genetics centres, the CEA-CNRGH sequencing platform and the Institut Bergonié's Bioinformatics Platform were involved in a multicentric study. The duration of each step of the genomic workflow was monitored and bottlenecks were identified.

resultsThirty barriers which could affect the quality of the samples, sequencing results and the duration of each step of the genomic pathway were identified and mastered. The global turnaround time from the sample reception to the MTB report was of 44 calendar days.

conclusionOur results demonstrate the feasibility of tumour genomic analysis by WES/RNASeq within a time frame compatible with the current cancer patient care. Lessons learnt from the Multipli WES/RNASeq Platforms Workflow Study will constitute guidelines for the forthcoming Multipli study and more broadly for the future clinical routine practice in the first two France Genomic Medicine 2025 platforms.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesFranceGenomicsHumansPilot Projectsclinical practiceguidelinesnext-generation sequencingtargeted therapyWES/RNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32713836
PMCPMC7383956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.