Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32713309›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

A data-driven method for reconstructing and modelling social interactions in moving animal groups.

R Escobedo, V Lecheval, V Papaspyros, F Bonnet, F Mondada, C Sire, G Theraulaz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Selective social interactions and speed-induced leadership in schooling fish.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Collective behavior from surprise minimization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Collective information processing in human phase separation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Multi-scale analysis and modelling of collective migration in biological systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

R EscobedoCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) & Université de Toulouse - Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France.
V LechevalDepartment of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
V PapaspyrosMOBOTS group, Biorobotics laboratory, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
F BonnetMOBOTS group, Biorobotics laboratory, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
F MondadaMOBOTS group, Biorobotics laboratory, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
C SireLaboratoire de Physique Théorique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) & Université de Toulouse - Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France.
G TheraulazCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) & Université de Toulouse - Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group-living organisms that collectively migrate range from cells and bacteria to human crowds, and include swarms of insects, schools of fish, and flocks of birds or ungulates. Unveiling the behavioural and cognitive mechanisms by which these groups coordinate their movements is a challenging task. These mechanisms take place at the individual scale and can be described as a combination of interactions between individuals and interactions between these individuals and the physical obstacles in the environment. Thanks to the development of novel tracking techniques that provide large and accurate datasets, the main characteristics of individual and collective behavioural patterns can be quantified with an unprecedented level of precision. However, in a large number of studies, social interactions are usually described by force map methods that only have a limited capacity of explanation and prediction, being rarely suitable for a direct implementation in a concise and explicit mathematical model. Here, we present a general method to extract the interactions between individuals that are involved in the coordination of collective movements in groups of organisms. We then apply this method to characterize social interactions in two species of shoaling fish, the rummy-nose tetra (

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalMovementSocial BehaviorAnimalsCharacidaeEthologySocial InteractionZebrafishcollective animal behaviourcollective motionDanio reriodata-based modellingfish interactionsHemigrammus rhodostomus

Identifiers

PMID32713309
PMCPMC7423377
OpenAlexW3044673138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.