ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020
Mathematical models for cell migration: a non-local perspective.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- HB-EGF enhances collective cell migration via spatial coordination of traction.APL bioengineering · 2026Article
- Data Science Opportunities To Improve Radiotherapy Planning and Clinical Decision Making.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Migration of Chemical Compounds from Packaging Materials into Packaged Foods: Interaction, Mechanism, Assessment, and Regulations.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Modelling non-local cell-cell adhesion: a multiscale approach.Journal of mathematical biology · 2024Article
- Mechanics of Small-Scale Spherical Inclusions Using Nonlocal Poroelasticity Integrated with Light Gradient Boosting Machine.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Quantifying tissue growth, shape and collision via continuum models and Bayesian inference.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Article
- Multi-Cue Kinetic Model with Non-Local Sensing for Cell Migration on a Fiber Network with Chemotaxis.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2022Article
- Leadership Through Influence: What Mechanisms Allow Leaders to Steer a Swarm?Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- Nonlocal and local models for taxis in cell migration: a rigorous limit procedure.Journal of mathematical biology · 2020Article
- Multi-scale analysis and modelling of collective migration in biological systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We provide a review of recent advancements in non-local continuous models for migration, mainly from the perspective of its involvement in embryonal development and cancer invasion. Particular emphasis is placed on spatial non-locality occurring in advection terms, used to characterize a cell's motility bias according to its interactions with other cellular and acellular components in its vicinity (e.g. cell-cell and cell-tissue adhesions, non-local chemotaxis), but we also briefly address spatially non-local source terms. Following a short introduction and description of applications, we give a systematic classification of available PDE models with respect to the type of featured non-localities and review some of the mathematical challenges arising from such models, with a focus on analytical aspects. This article is part of the theme issue 'Multi-scale analysis and modelling of collective migration in biological systems'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.