Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32713256›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2020

Former NICU Families Describe Gaps in Family-Centered Care.

Krista Sigurdson, Jochen Profit, Ravi Dhurjati, Christine Morton, Melissa Scala, Lelis Vernon, Ashley Randolph, Jessica T Phan, Linda S Franck

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Diversity, equity, and inclusion considerations for anti-racist, equity-focused NICU family mental health.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  5. The future of follow-up: technology-enabled medical and developmental follow-up care for NICU graduates.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Staff perspectives on racial inequities in the neonatal intensive care unit: the REJOICE study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Experiences of communication in the neonatal intensive care unit for mothers with a preferred language other than English.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Increasing in-person medical interpreter utilization in the NICU through a bundle of interventions.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  16. "AJP reports · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Krista SigurdsonStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2611-6904
Jochen ProfitStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Ravi DhurjatiStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Christine MortonStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Melissa ScalaStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Lelis VernonVermont Oxford Network, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
Ashley RandolphGLO Preemies, Sacramento, California, USA.
Jessica T PhanUniversity of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Linda S FranckSchool of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Palo Alto University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of South Florida · USVermont Oxford Network · US

Funding

A Dashboard of Racial/Ethnic Disparity in Care Provided by NICUsR01HD083368 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PROFIT, JOCHEN · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Care and outcomes of infants admitted to neonatal intensive care vary and differences in family-centered care may contribute. The objective of this study was to understand families' experiences of neonatal care within a framework of family-centered care. We conducted focus groups and interviews with 18 family members whose infants were cared for in California neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) using a grounded theory approach and centering the accounts of families of color and/or of low socioeconomic status. Families identified the following challenges that indicated a gap in mutual trust and power sharing: conflict with or lack of knowledge about social work; staff judgment of, or unwillingness to address barriers to family presence at bedside; need for nurse continuity and meaningful relationship with nurses and inconsistent access to translation services. These unmet needs for partnership in care or support were particularly experienced by parents of color or of low socioeconomic status.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPatient-Centered CareChildChild, PreschoolFamilyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care, NeonatalQualitative ResearchCaliforniafamily-centered caregrounded theoryneonatal carepatient-and-family engaged researchqualitativequality-of-care

Identifiers

PMID32713256
PMCPMC8106872
OpenAlexW3044864477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.