ReviewBreast cancer research and treatment2020
A system for risk stratification and prioritization of breast cancer surgeries delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic: preparing for re-entry.
Review in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship between Screening, Diagnostic Mammograms, Hospital Admissions, and Mortality Rates from Breast Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric spinal care: A multi-centric study.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Fertility-sparing surgery: a hopeful strategy for young women with cancer.Journal of medicine and life · 2023Review
- Rural-Urban Differences in Breast Cancer Surgical Delays in Medicare Beneficiaries.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- The safety of performing breast reconstruction during the COVID-19 pandemic.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022Article
- Declining interest in clinical imaging during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of Google Trends data.Clinical imaging · 2021Article
- Cardiovascular-related health behaviors and lifestyle during the COVID-19 pandemic: An infodemiology study.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2021Article
- The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2021Review
- Lessons Learned: Management of Breast Cancer Patients throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic.Current breast cancer reports · 2021Review
- Delayed Breast Cancer Detection in an Asian Country (Taiwan) with Low COVID-19 Incidence.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Psychosocial Impact of Cancer Care Disruptions in Women With Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, most breast surgery for benign and malignant conditions has been postponed, creating a backlog of patients who will need surgery. A fair and transparent system for assessing the risk of further delaying surgery for individual patients to prioritize surgical scheduling is needed.
methodsFactors related to risk of delaying surgery for breast patients were identified. Scores were assigned to each factor, with higher scores indicating a greater risk from delaying surgery. REDCap and Microsoft Excel tools were designed to track and score delayed patients.
resultsPublished data and multidisciplinary clinical judgement were used to assign risk scores based on patient and tumor factors, length of delay, and tumor response to preoperative therapy. Patients completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were assigned the highest scores as their options for delaying surgery are most limited. Among patients receiving neoadjuvant endocrine therapy or no medical therapy, higher scores were assigned for low-estrogen receptor or high-genomic risk scores, higher grade, larger tumors, younger age and longer delay. High priority scores were assigned for progression during preoperative therapy. Low scores were assigned for re-excisions, atypical lesions and other benign indications. There was good agreement of the tool's ranking of sample patients with rankings by experienced clinicians. The tool generates risk-stratified patient lists by surgeon or institution to facilitate assignment of surgery dates.
conclusionsThis tool generates a clinically consistent, risk-stratified priority list of breast surgical procedures delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic. This systematic approach may facilitate surgical scheduling as conditions normalize.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.