ArticleHealth & justice2020
Exploring the promise of intersectionality for promoting justice-involved women's health research and policy.
Article in Health & justice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- From use to abuse: psychological, neurobiological, and spiritual pathways in relational harm and recovery.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Intersectionality in healthcare leadership: a scoping review on the career experiences of racially and ethnically minoritised women health professionals.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Chronic Disease Burden and Healthcare Utilization by Gender Among US Adults with Lifetime Criminal Legal Involvement.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Adverse Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes Among Birthing People in Same-Sex and Different-Sex Relationships in Louisiana.LGBT health · 2025Article
- Trauma, Justice, and Equity: Using Critical Theories and Concepts to Address Systemic Harm Among Youth Punishment System-Involved Black Girls.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Justice for rural women: An exploratory analysis of institutions and mechanisms to access justice in Chimborazo, Ecuador.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Cultural accommodation of internet-based interventions for substance use and related disorders: a proposed comprehensive framework based on a pilot study and a literature review.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- Shifting the discourse on disability: Moving to an inclusive, intersectional focus.The American journal of orthopsychiatry · 2023Article
- Prevalence and risk factors for opioid related mortality among probation clients in an American city.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2022Article
- Trauma, Mental Health Distress, and Infectious Disease Prevention Among Women Recently Released From Incarceration.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Mapping out epistemic justice in the clinical space: using narrative techniques to affirm patients as knowers.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2021Review
- Redesigning culturally tailored intervention in the precision health era: Self-management science context.Nursing outlookArticle
- Physical and social sleep environment of a women's prison: A qualitative exploration.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The perspective of intersectionality has gained widespread scholarly interest and been employed across many different disciplines, including criminology. This perspective focuses on interlocking systems of oppression and the need to work toward structural changes to promote social justice and equity. The present article aimed to explore the potential of intersectionality for advancing health research and policy regarding justice-involved women, in different phases of the judicial process, based on the extant literature.First, employing an intersectional approach to analyze the issue of health during the pre-incarceration period may facilitate identification of the structural and representational factors underlying the barriers that women face in obtaining health services, which elevates the risk to their health. Furthermore, adopting an intersectionality perspective to explore women's health during incarceration may shed light on vulnerable, invisible subpopulations of women such as incarcerated older women and their health problems, and help identify the structural barriers to carceral health services and the role of stigma in inflicting and normalizing harmful practices within prison walls. In addition, an intersectionality lens highlights the risk of unintended use of scholarly knowledge regarding the health of justice-involved women. Last, an intersectionality perspective is particularly relevant for research of the reentry of justice-involved women. In particular, it can be used to examine gender-sensitive reentry services that ignore other axes of marginalization, such as class and race, generating a powerful dynamic that results in partial service, denial of access to therapeutic resources, and possible exposure to health-damaging environments.Through an exploration of the extant literature on justice-involved women, I endeavored to demonstrate that an intersectional framework offers powerful tools to both challenge and strengthen gender frameworks within criminology. This will make it possible to move beyond consideration of gender alone, to understand how systems of oppression based on race, age and other social locations intersect and combine to construct health disadvantages among justice-involved women. This highlights the needs for a new research agenda and policy that integrate the intersectional framework with health theories to provide a more developed understanding of health among justice-involved women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.