Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32712835›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2021

The use of biosynthetic mesh in giant hiatal hernia repair: is there a rationale? A 3-year single-center experience.

E Tartaglia, D Cuccurullo, L Guerriero, S Reggio, C Sagnelli, P Mugione, F Corcione

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06444347 (The Impact of Biosynthetic Mesh on Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in Robotic Anti-Reflux Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06444347 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Biosynthetic Mesh on Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in Robotic Anti-Reflux Surgery: A Multi-Institutional Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRan2024 to 2030Enrolled200ConditionsHiatal HerniaArmsBiosynthetic Mesh, Hiatal Hernia Repair
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and safety of mesh reinforced cruroplasty with Phasix™ ST vs. Bio-AHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E TartagliaDepartment of Laparoscopic and Robotic General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli "Monaldi Hospital", 80131, Napoli, Italy. ernesto.tartaglia@gmail.com.
D CuccurulloDepartment of Laparoscopic and Robotic General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli "Monaldi Hospital", 80131, Napoli, Italy.
L GuerrieroDepartment of Laparoscopic and Robotic General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli "Monaldi Hospital", 80131, Napoli, Italy.
S ReggioDepartment of Laparoscopic and Robotic General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli "Monaldi Hospital", 80131, Napoli, Italy.
C SagnelliDepartment of Laparoscopic and Robotic General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli "Monaldi Hospital", 80131, Napoli, Italy.
P MugioneDepartment of Laparoscopic and Robotic General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli "Monaldi Hospital", 80131, Napoli, Italy.
F CorcioneDepartment of Laparoscopic and Robotic General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli "Monaldi Hospital", 80131, Napoli, Italy.
Ospedale Monaldi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeReinforced prosthetic crural repair is particularly indicated for giant hiatal hernias. The rationale is to reduce the recurrence rate in the long term. The aim of our study is to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic giant hiatal hernia repair using a biosynthetic mesh.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 44 patients who underwent laparoscopic mesh-reinforced hiatal closure and fundoplication using a biosynthetic material. Inclusion criterion was large hiatal defects (> 5 cm). Follow-up was scheduled at 6, 12 and 36 months after surgery.

results44 patients (29F) with a mean age of 62 years (range 14-85) and mean of BMI 24.5 kg/m

conclusionsThe use of biosynthetic mesh for crural reinforcement is associated with a low incidence of mesh-related complications and with a reasonably low recurrence rate (4.5%) at 36 months. However, additional data with longer follow-up are needed to determine long-term safety and efficacy.

Indexed as

Hernia, HiatalLaparoscopyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFundoplicationHerniorrhaphyHumansMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBiosynthetic meshDiaphragmatic ruptureFundoplicationHiatal herniaParaesophageal herniaTissue reinforcement

Identifiers

PMID32712835
OpenAlexW3045480273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.