Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32712783›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2020

Are Concomitant Operations During Bariatric Surgery Safe? An Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database.

Benjamin Clapp, Isaac Lee, Evan Liggett, Michael Cutshall, Bryson Tudor, Grishma Pradhan, Katherine Aguirre, Alan Tyroch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Cholecystolithiasis and intestinal bypass procedures].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin ClappDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, Paul Foster School of Medicine, 1700 N. Mesa, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA. b_clapp1@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9892-4708
Isaac LeeDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, Paul Foster School of Medicine, 1700 N. Mesa, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA.
Evan LiggettDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, Paul Foster School of Medicine, 1700 N. Mesa, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA.
Michael CutshallDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, Paul Foster School of Medicine, 1700 N. Mesa, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA.
Bryson TudorDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, Paul Foster School of Medicine, 1700 N. Mesa, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA.
Grishma PradhanDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, Paul Foster School of Medicine, 1700 N. Mesa, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA.
Katherine AguirreDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, Paul Foster School of Medicine, 1700 N. Mesa, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA.
Alan TyrochDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, Paul Foster School of Medicine, 1700 N. Mesa, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA.
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe American College of Surgeons tracks 30-day outcomes using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Initiative Program (MBSAQIP) database. We examined the short-term outcomes of patients that undergo bariatric surgery concomitantly with other operations such as hernia repairs and cholecystectomy to determine the safety of this practice.

methodsThe MBSAQIP Participant Use Data File for 2015-2017 was examined for differences in primary bariatric operations vs concomitant procedures (CP). We looked for concurrent CPT codes for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and hernia repairs (ventral, epigastric, incisional, and inguinal). p was significant at < 0.05.

resultsThere were 464,674 cases, of which 15,614 had CP. For both LRYGB+LC and SG+LC, there were increased operative times and length of stay. There were statistically significant higher rates of readmission, reintervention, and reoperation for SG+LC vs SG alone, as well as for LRYGB+hernia and SG+hernia. There was a higher risk of death (p < 0.001) in LRYGB+hernia patients. Also, LRYGB+hernia patients had statistically significant increases in unplanned admission to the intensive care unit and pulmonary embolus. SG+hernia patients had a higher rate of ventilation > 48 h, unplanned admission to the ICU, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and readmission, reintervention, and reoperation.

conclusionsThere is a statistically higher rate of complications with concomitant procedures in the MBSAQIP database. Length of stay and operative times are increased in concomitant operations as are readmissions, reinterventions, and reoperations. These findings would indicate that additional procedures at the time of bariatric surgery should be deferred if possible.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastric BypassLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidAccreditationHumansPostoperative ComplicationsBariatric surgeryCombined proceduresConcomitant proceduresMetabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation quality improvement program (MBSAQIP)

Identifiers

PMID32712783
OpenAlexW3045164229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.