Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32712756›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2020

The enrichment of anaerobic fungi and methanogens showed higher lignocellulose degrading and methane producing ability than that of bacteria and methanogens.

Yuping Ma, Yuanfei Li, Yuqi Li, Yanfen Cheng, Weiyun Zhu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Anaerobic Degradation of the Invasive WeedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Rumen Microbiome Reveals the Differential Response of COAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  5. Hydrogenosome, Pairing Anaerobic Fungi and HJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuping MaLaboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, National Center for International Research on Animal Gut Nutrition, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Yuanfei LiLaboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, National Center for International Research on Animal Gut Nutrition, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Yuqi LiLaboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, National Center for International Research on Animal Gut Nutrition, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Yanfen ChengLaboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, National Center for International Research on Animal Gut Nutrition, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China. yanfencheng@njau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8935-9551
Weiyun ZhuLaboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, National Center for International Research on Animal Gut Nutrition, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Nanjing Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities KYDK201701National Natural Science Foundation of China 31772627One Belt and One Road Technical Cooperation Project of Jiangsu Province BZ2018055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, rumen content was used to obtain three enrichments of anaerobic fungi and methanogens (F + M enrichment), bacteria and methanogens (B + M enrichment), and whole rumen content (WRC enrichment), to evaluate their respective ability to degrade lignocellulose and produce methane. Among the treatments, F + M enrichment elicited the strongest lignocellulose degradation and methane production ability with both rice straw and wheat straw as substrates. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis and diversity analyses of methanogens in the three enrichment treatments demonstrated that F + M had larger number of 16S rRNA gene copies of methanogens and higher relative abundance of Methanobrevibacter, the predominant methanogen found in all enrichments. Caecomyces was the main anaerobic fungal genus for co-culturing to provide substrates for methanogens in this enrichment. Importantly, the F + M enrichment was stable and could be maintained with transfers supplied every 3 days, confirming its potential utility in anaerobic digestion for lignocellulose degradation and methane production.

Indexed as

AnaerobiosisAnimalsBacteriaEuryarchaeotaFermentationFungiLigninMethaneRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRumenTriticumLigninlignocelluloseMethaneRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnaerobic fungiBacteriaMethanogensRice strawWheat straw

Identifiers

PMID32712756
OpenAlexW3044213350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.