ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2021
Predictors for non-delayed discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: utility of echocardiographic parameters.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex Differences Among Patients With Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-Center Observational Study.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2026Observational
- Short-term Outcomes of Urgent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis That Requires Emergency Hospital Admission.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Considering that transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures have become less invasive, the duration for monitoring patient care after a successful TAVR can be reduced. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of baseline echocardiographic parameters for non-delayed discharge in patients after TAVR. The study group included 154 consecutive patients (mean age: 84.4 ± 4.5 years; and 101 women) who underwent a TAVR. Comprehensive echocardiograms including both side indices of myocardial performance (IMP) and blood tests were obtained prior to the TAVR procedure. The median post-TAVR length of stay was 6 days while the mode and first quartile were both 4 days. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the optimum cut-off value of the left-sided IMP in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, ≥ 50%) (n = 124) for non-delayed discharge (≤ 4 days) was 0.34 with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.71563 and p value of < 0.0001, while the optimum cut-off value in patients with reduced LVEF (< 50%) (n = 30) was 0.47 with an AUC value of 0.77778 and p value of < 0.0120. An adjusted analysis indicated the negative left-sided IMP results as the only predictor for non-delayed discharge (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the adjusted predictors for survival without early cardiovascular re-hospitalization within 6 months after TAVR were the positive left-sided IMP result, when the cut-off value of 0.52 was used, and the presence of elevated RAP of 8 to 15 mmHg. The early discharge policy should be carefully considered in high-risk populations, but the left-sided IMP may play a significant role in the pre-screening process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.