Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32712069›Full record

ArticleIntensive & critical care nursing2020

Psychological stress among health care professionals during the 2019 novel coronavirus disease Outbreak: Cases from online consulting customers.

Yarong Ma, Robert Rosenheck, Hongbo He

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive & critical care nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Early Care and Education Workers' Experience and Stress during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Role of Health Literacy among Outpatient Caregivers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on ICU Healthcare Professionals: A Mixed Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yarong MaAffiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), Guangzhou, China.
Robert RosenheckDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Hongbo HeAffiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: hongbo_he@yeah.net.
Guangzhou Medical University · CNYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak, online consulting has been widely used to address mental health problems, including health care professionals (HCPs) caring for COVID-19 patients who experienced substantial psychological distress.

aimTo explore the severity of perceived stress and potential correlates among the HCPs seeking online mental health services during the COVID-19 outbreak.

methodsA descriptive study was conducted among 34 HCPs to assess levels of psychological distress using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) questionnaire. The HCPs working in different departments were compared using χ

resultsThe sample overall (n = 34) showed a relatively moderate level of perceived stress (PSS mean = 15.71 ± 4.02) with 38% identified as depressed (PHQ-9 ≥ 5) and 24% as suffering from anxiety (GAD-7 ≥ 5). Those working at intensive care units (ICUs) or in departments of respiratory medicine (RM) demonstrated significantly higher perceived stress than those at other departments (adjusted mean: 17.48 ± 0.96 vs. 13.06 ± 1.25, p = .018, partial η

conclusionsThe psychological health status of frontline health care professionals during the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak warrants clinical attention. Online mental health services has played a major role although its effectiveness and barriers to its utilisation require further evaluation.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultBurnout, ProfessionalCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPneumonia, ViralResilience, PsychologicalStress, PsychologicalWork Schedule ToleranceCOVID-19Health care professionalsIntensive care unitsOnline mental health servicesPsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID32712069
PMCPMC7321034
OpenAlexW3038001156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.