Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32711709›Full record

SynthesisThe lancet. Psychiatry2020

Risk factors for self-harm in prison: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Louis Favril, Rongqin Yu, Keith Hawton, Seena Fazel

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The lancet. Psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 249 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Self-mutilation: a systematic review.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Systematic review of risk factors for violence in psychosis: 10-year update.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Louis FavrilInstitute for International Research on Criminal Policy, Faculty of Law and Criminology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Rongqin YuDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Keith HawtonCentre for Suicide Research, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Seena FazelDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: seena.fazel@psych.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBGhent University · BEWarneford Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 202836/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-harm is a leading cause of morbidity in prisoners. Although a wide range of risk factors for self-harm in prisoners has been identified, the strength and consistency of effect sizes is uncertain. We aimed to synthesise evidence and assess the risk factors associated with self-harm inside prison.

methodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO) for observational studies on risk factors for self-harm in prisoners published from database inception to Oct 31, 2019, supplemented through correspondence with authors of studies. We included primary studies involving adults sampled from general prison populations who self-harmed in prison and a comparison group without self-harm in prison. We excluded studies with qualitative or ecological designs, those that reported on lifetime measures of self-harm or on selected samples of prisoners, and those with a comparison group that was not appropriate or not based on general prison populations. Data were extracted from the articles and requested from study authors. Our primary outcome was the risk of self-harm for risk factors in prisoners. We pooled effect sizes as odds ratios (OR) using random effects models for each risk factor examined in at least three distinct samples. We assessed study quality on the basis of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and examined between-study heterogeneity. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42018087915.

findingsWe identified 35 independent studies from 20 countries comprising a total of 663 735 prisoners, of whom 24 978 (3·8%) had self-harmed in prison. Across the 40 risk factors examined, the strongest associations with self-harm in prison were found for suicide-related antecedents, including current or recent suicidal ideation (OR 13·8, 95% CI 8·6-22·1; I

interpretationThe wide range of risk factors across clinical and custody-related domains underscores the need for a comprehensive, prison-wide approach towards preventing self-harm in prison. This approach should incorporate both population and targeted strategies, with multiagency collaboration between the services for mental health, social care, and criminal justice having a key role.

fundingWellcome Trust.

Indexed as

Borderline Personality DisorderCase-Control StudiesCrime VictimsCriminal LawEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMental DisordersMental HealthObservational Studies as TopicPrisonersRisk FactorsSelf-Injurious BehaviorSuicidal Ideation

Identifiers

PMID32711709
PMCPMC7606912
OpenAlexW3044322306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.