Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32711684›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Global health2020

Early policy actions and emergency response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Mongolia: experiences and challenges.

Ryenchindorj Erkhembayar, Emma Dickinson, Darmaa Badarch, Indermohan Narula, David Warburton, Graham Neil Thomas, Chimedsuren Ochir, Semira Manaseki-Holland

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes in Mongolia: Results from Population-Based Survey Compared with 1999 Study.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ryenchindorj ErkhembayarDepartment of International Cyber Education, Graduate School, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Emma DickinsonInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Darmaa BadarchNational Influenza Centre, National Centre of Communicable Diseases, Ministry of Health, Ulaanbataar, Mongolia.
Indermohan NarulaSchool of Public Health, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences Global Fund, Ulaanbataar, Mongolia.
David WarburtonThe Saban Research Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Graham Neil ThomasInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Chimedsuren OchirDepartment of International Cyber Education, Graduate School, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Electronic address: chimedsuren@mnums.edu.mn.
Semira Manaseki-HollandInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Electronic address: s.manasekiholland@bham.ac.uk.
University of Birmingham · GBMongolian National University of Medical Sciences · MNMongolian National University · MNNational Influenza Center · MNUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Country-led control measures to contain the spread of the novel coronavirus, COVID-19, have been diverse. Originating in Wuhan, China, in December, 2019, the COVID-19 outbreak was declared a pandemic by WHO on March 11, 2020. In recognition of the severity of the outbreak, and having the longest shared border with China, the Government of Mongolia activated the State Emergency Committee in January, 2020, on the basis of the 2017 Disaster Protection Law. As a result, various public health measures have been taken that led to delaying the first confirmed case of COVID-19 until March 10, 2020, and with no intensive care admissions or deaths until July 6, 2020. These measures included promoting universal personal protection and preventions, such as the use of face masks and handwashing, restricting international travel, suspending all training and educational activities from kindergartens to universities, and banning major public gatherings such as the celebration of the national New Year holiday. These measures have been accompanied by active infection surveillance and self-isolation recommendations. The Mongolian case shows that with robust preventive systems, an effective response to a pandemic can be mounted in a low-income or middle-income country. We hereby examine the emergency preparedness experience, effectiveness, and challenges of the early outbreak policies on COVID-19 prevention in Mongolia, as well as any unintended consequences.

Indexed as

PolicyCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansMongoliaPandemicsPneumonia, Viral

Identifiers

PMID32711684
PMCPMC7377809
OpenAlexW3045484337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.