Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32711441›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2020

Comparative Analysis of Breast Cancer Incidence Rates between Australia and Japan: Screening Target Implications.

Miwa Mia Mizukoshi, Syeda Zakia Hossian, Ann Poulos

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Breast Cancer Statistics in Korea, 2018.Journal of breast cancer · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miwa Mia MizukoshiDiscipline of Behaviour and Social Sciences in Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.
Syeda Zakia HossianDiscipline of Behaviour and Social Sciences in Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.
Ann PoulosDiscipline of Medical Radiation Sciences, The University of Sydney, Australia.
University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this analysis was to compare the age-specific incidence rates (ASIRs) of breast cancer in Australia and Japan to determine the appropriateness of national screening target age groups.

methodsThe paper is based on secondary sources of data. The ASIRs in 2006-2015 were collected from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) and the National Cancer Center Japan. Descriptive analysis was performed for a comparison of ASIRs between Australia and Japan by age and over time. Percentage change, rolling average and risk ratio were calculated for further analysis.

resultsIn Australia, ASIRs rose sharply from age 40 years and peaked at 65-69 years. Japanese data demonstrated a considerable increase each year and two peaks were recorded, at ages 45-49 and 60-64. The ASIRs after age 65 decreased with age in Japan but increased with age in Australia. The ASIRs of women aged 40-49 was lowest among Australian women and the highest among Japanese women, while they had similar ASIRs in the direct comparative analysis.

conclusionsThe screening age range of Australian and Japanese national breast cancer screening guidelines covers incidence peak ages in each country and therefore provides benefit for cancer screening. Our findings also indicated that further evidence is required to investigate the inclusion of Japanese migrant women in Australia aged 40-49 years into the screening target and the BCI rates of post-migrant women in Australia as different migrant groups have different ASIRs. This is to ensure that the groups of women with the highest cancer incidence are appropriately covered in screening programs.<br />.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAustraliaBreast NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornAustraliabreast cancerIncidenceJapanScreening

Identifiers

PMID32711441
PMCPMC7573426
OpenAlexW3045018568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.