Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32710969›Full record

ReviewBiochemical pharmacology2020

Approaching coronavirus disease 2019: Mechanisms of action of repurposed drugs with potential activity against SARS-CoV-2.

Lucia Lisi, Pedro Miguel Lacal, Maria Luisa Barbaccia, Grazia Graziani

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Anticipated pharmacological role of Aviptadil on COVID-19.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Review
  5. Drug Repurposing: a Shortcut to New Biological Entities.Pharmaceutical chemistry journal · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. New Insights Into Drug Repurposing for COVID-19 Using Deep Learning.IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems · 2021
    Review
  8. Repurpose but also (nano)-reformulate! The potential role of nanomedicine in the battle against SARS-CoV2.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Cyclodextrins in the antiviral therapy.Journal of drug delivery science and technology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib inhibits SARS-CoV-2 in vitro.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucia LisiDipartimento di Bioetica e Sicurezza, Sezione di Farmacologia, Catholic University Medical School, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Pedro Miguel LacalIDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.
Maria Luisa BarbacciaDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Grazia GrazianiDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy. Electronic address: graziani@uniroma2.it.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) a global pandemic. As of July 2020, SARS-CoV-2 has infected more than 14 million people and provoked more than 590,000 deaths, worldwide. From the beginning, a variety of pharmacological treatments has been empirically used to cope with the life-threatening complications associated with Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Thus far, only a couple of them and not consistently across reports have been shown to further decrease mortality, respect to what can be achieved with supportive care. In most cases, and due to the urgency imposed by the number and severity of the patients' clinical conditions, the choice of treatment has been limited to repurposed drugs, approved for other indications, or investigational agents used for other viral infections often rendered available on a compassionate-use basis. The rationale for drug selection was mainly, though not exclusively, based either i) on the activity against other coronaviruses or RNA viruses in order to potentially hamper viral entry and replication in the epithelial cells of the airways, and/or ii) on the ability to modulate the excessive inflammatory reaction deriving from dysregulated host immune responses against the SARS-CoV-2. In several months, an exceptionally large number of clinical trials have been designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anti-COVID-19 therapies in different clinical settings (treatment or pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis) and levels of disease severity, but only few of them have been completed so far. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms of action that have provided the scientific rationale for the empirical use and evaluation in clinical trials of structurally different and often functionally unrelated drugs during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDrug RepositioningAnimalsAntiviral AgentsBetacoronavirusCardiovascular DiseasesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentCytokinesHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Antiviral AgentsCytokinesAntiviral agentsCoronavirusCOVID-19Cytokine stormDrug repositioningSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32710969
PMCPMC7375972
OpenAlexW3045453828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.