ReviewJournal of the American College of Cardiology2020
Multimodality Imaging in Evaluation of Cardiovascular Complications in Patients With COVID-19: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.
Review in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04794062 (Myocardial Injury and Quality of Life in Patients Recovered From the Pneumonia Associated With the Novel Coronavirus Infectious Disease COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Myocardial Injury and Quality of Life in Patients Recovered From the Pneumonia Associated With the Novel Coronavirus Infectious Disease COVID-19
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heart failure during the COVID-19 pandemic: clinical, diagnostic, management, and organizational dilemmas.ESC heart failure · 2022Pooled it
- Cardiogenic shock and acute renal failure associated mortality trends in the United States: a retrospective analysis of death records from 1999 to 2023.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Impact of self-reported SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity on cardiac structure and function: findings from UK Biobank CMR cohort.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Reveals Cardiac Inflammation and Fibrosis in Symptomatic Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: Findings from the INSPIRE-CMR Multicenter Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Epidemiology of myocarditis following COVID-19 or influenza and use of diagnostic assessments.Open heart · 2024Article
- The Role and Implications of COVID-19 in Incident and Prevalent Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2024Review
- MRI of cardiac involvement in COVID-19.The British journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Barriers and shortcomings in access to cardiovascular management and prevention for familial hypercholesterolemia during the COVID-19 pandemic.Clinical cardiology · 2023Review
- Cardiovascular Considerations in the Management of People With Suspected Long COVID.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2023Review
- Multimodality Cardiac Imaging in COVID.Circulation research · 2023Review
- Advanced Imaging Supports the Mechanistic Role of Autoimmunity and Plaque Rupture in COVID-19 Heart Involvement.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2023Review
- Impact of COVID-19 pneumonia on pulmonary vascular volume.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- The Impact of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme-2/Angiotensin 1-7 Axis in Establishing Severe COVID-19 Consequences.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Vascular Implications of COVID-19: Role of Radiological Imaging, Artificial Intelligence, and Tissue Characterization: A Special Report.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Review
- Cardiovascular Complications of Pregnancy-Associated COVID-19 Infections.JACC. Advances · 2022Review
- Echocardiographic assessment of COVID19 sequelae in survivors with elevated cardiac biomarkers.International journal of cardiology · 2022Article
- Myocarditis and Cardiac Complications Associated With COVID-19 and mRNA Vaccination: A Pragmatic Narrative Review to Guide Clinical Practice.Heart, lung & circulation · 2022Review
- Co-Management of COVID-19 and Heart Failure During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Cardiovascular manifestations secondary to COVID-19: A narrative review.Respiratory medicine and research · 2022Review
- [Consensus document of the Mexican Society of Cardiology for post-COVID-19 cardiovascular clinical follow-up].Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standard evaluation and management of the patient with suspected or proven cardiovascular complications of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), the disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome related-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), is challenging. Routine history, physical examination, laboratory testing, electrocardiography, and plain x-ray imaging may often suffice for such patients, but given overlap between COVID-19 and typical cardiovascular diagnoses such as heart failure and acute myocardial infarction, need frequently arises for advanced imaging techniques to assist in differential diagnosis and management. This document provides guidance in several common scenarios among patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection and possible cardiovascular involvement, including chest discomfort with electrocardiographic changes, acute hemodynamic instability, newly recognized left ventricular dysfunction, as well as imaging during the subacute/chronic phase of COVID-19. For each, the authors consider the role of biomarker testing to guide imaging decision-making, provide differential diagnostic considerations, and offer general suggestions regarding application of various advanced imaging techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.