Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32710748›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2020

Culturable diversity of bacterial endophytes associated with medicinal plants of the Western Ghats, India.

Gordon Webster, Alex J Mullins, Edward Cunningham-Oakes, Arun Renganathan, Jamuna Bai Aswathanarayan, Eshwar Mahenthiralingam, Ravishankar Rai Vittal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Polyyne-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gordon WebsterMicrobiomes, Microbes and Informatics Group, Organisms and Environment Division, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AX, Wales, UK.
Alex J MullinsMicrobiomes, Microbes and Informatics Group, Organisms and Environment Division, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AX, Wales, UK.
Edward Cunningham-OakesMicrobiomes, Microbes and Informatics Group, Organisms and Environment Division, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AX, Wales, UK.
Arun RenganathanDepartment of Studies in Microbiology, University of Mysore, Karnataka, 570006, Mysore, India.
Jamuna Bai AswathanarayanDepartment of Studies in Microbiology, University of Mysore, Karnataka, 570006, Mysore, India.
Eshwar MahenthiralingamMicrobiomes, Microbes and Informatics Group, Organisms and Environment Division, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AX, Wales, UK.
Ravishankar Rai VittalDepartment of Studies in Microbiology, University of Mysore, Karnataka, 570006, Mysore, India.
Cardiff University · GBUniversity of Mysore · IN

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L021692/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M009122/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S007652/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial endophytes are found in the internal tissues of plants and have intimate associations with their host. However, little is known about the diversity of medicinal plant endophytes (ME) or their capability to produce specialised metabolites that may contribute to therapeutic properties. We isolated 75 bacterial ME from 24 plant species of the Western Ghats, India. Molecular identification by 16S rRNA gene sequencing grouped MEs into 13 bacterial genera, with members of Gammaproteobacteria and Firmicutes being the most abundant. To improve taxonomic identification, 26 selected MEs were genome sequenced and average nucleotide identity (ANI) used to identify them to the species-level. This identified multiple species in the most common genus as Bacillus. Similarly, identity of the Enterobacterales was also distinguished within Enterobacter and Serratia by ANI and core-gene analysis. AntiSMASH identified non-ribosomal peptide synthase, lantipeptide and bacteriocin biosynthetic gene clusters (BGC) as the most common BGCs found in the ME genomes. A total of five of the ME isolates belonging to Bacillus, Serratia and Enterobacter showed antimicrobial activity against the plant pathogen Pectobacterium carotovorum. Using molecular and genomic approaches we have characterised a unique collection of endophytic bacteria from medicinal plants. Their genomes encode multiple specialised metabolite gene clusters and the collection can now be screened for novel bioactive and medicinal metabolites.

Indexed as

EndophytesPlants, MedicinalBacteriaIndiaPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SantimicrobialsBacillusbacterial genomesbiosynthetic gene clustersendophytic bacteriamedicinal plants

Identifiers

PMID32710748
PMCPMC7422900
OpenAlexW3045004173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.